2022
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv1wdvx2p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heritage and Nationalism

Abstract: List of figures ix List of tables xiii Acknowledgements xvii Author's note xix 1 Introduction 1 2 Using big data 13 3 Nationalism, populism and the past 30 4 Italian populism and the 2018 General Election 48 5 The Brexit referendum 78 6 The 'great wall' of Trump 108 7 Experts, authority and social fabrics 139 8 Conclusion: a new perspective 169 References 183 Index 204 LiST Of figurES ix List of figuresLiST Of TABLES xv I wholeheartedly thank Richard Hingley (Durham University), PI of the project, for his insp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 180 publications
(331 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others show how HMI practices emerge in diverse contexts and institutional-community negotiations surrounding digital heritage (Cameron & Kenderdine, 2007;Drotner & Schrøder, 2013;Giaccardi, 2012;Kalay et al, 2007;Parry, 2010). More recently, Chiara Bonacchi leveraged the power of big data to demonstrate the relevance of HMI-related SNS practices in contexts such as Brexit, Donald Trump's demonization of immigrants, and the rise of populism and nationalism in Italy (Bonacchi, 2022). At the intersection between heritage and digital social media communication, research on HMI on SNS practices addresses issues as diverse as Holocaust commemoration (Manca, 2021;Wight, 2020), the ''memory wars'' of Eastern and Central Europe (Rutten et al, 2013), heritage preservation (Sedlacik, 2015), community engagement with local history (Hood & Reid, 2018), archeological communication (Colley, 2014) between professionals (Richardson, 2015) and with mateur communities (Kelpsiene, 2019), institutional museum communication (Kidd, 2014), education (Charitonos et al, 2012), and marketing (Chung et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others show how HMI practices emerge in diverse contexts and institutional-community negotiations surrounding digital heritage (Cameron & Kenderdine, 2007;Drotner & Schrøder, 2013;Giaccardi, 2012;Kalay et al, 2007;Parry, 2010). More recently, Chiara Bonacchi leveraged the power of big data to demonstrate the relevance of HMI-related SNS practices in contexts such as Brexit, Donald Trump's demonization of immigrants, and the rise of populism and nationalism in Italy (Bonacchi, 2022). At the intersection between heritage and digital social media communication, research on HMI on SNS practices addresses issues as diverse as Holocaust commemoration (Manca, 2021;Wight, 2020), the ''memory wars'' of Eastern and Central Europe (Rutten et al, 2013), heritage preservation (Sedlacik, 2015), community engagement with local history (Hood & Reid, 2018), archeological communication (Colley, 2014) between professionals (Richardson, 2015) and with mateur communities (Kelpsiene, 2019), institutional museum communication (Kidd, 2014), education (Charitonos et al, 2012), and marketing (Chung et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%