2016
DOI: 10.3986/ags.3348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heritage protection through a geomorphologist’s eyes: From recording to awareness raising

Abstract: -

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…MoreoverSimilarly to the analysis carried out on PGmfs values, the AB Gtr, characterized byshowing higher values in term of PU and EIn values, result, seems to be the more suitable for educational purpose and for disseminationaddressed to a general public.public, also thanks to the presence of official archeosites (i.e., Nucleo Alpino "Le Cascine" and Fornaci della Calce) linked with PGmfs. On the contrary, the AA Gtr, showing higher SV, AV, GV and SIn, could be considered for geoconservation practices or used to promote, from a strictly scientific point of view, the geogeo(morpho)logical heritage characterizing the area inside the SVGP (e.g., Smrekar et al 2016). Finally it is worth to be considered that the morphological features and values of Gtrs and of Gmfs, has to be periodically reassessed, especially when located in a dynamic environment as the mountain one.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MoreoverSimilarly to the analysis carried out on PGmfs values, the AB Gtr, characterized byshowing higher values in term of PU and EIn values, result, seems to be the more suitable for educational purpose and for disseminationaddressed to a general public.public, also thanks to the presence of official archeosites (i.e., Nucleo Alpino "Le Cascine" and Fornaci della Calce) linked with PGmfs. On the contrary, the AA Gtr, showing higher SV, AV, GV and SIn, could be considered for geoconservation practices or used to promote, from a strictly scientific point of view, the geogeo(morpho)logical heritage characterizing the area inside the SVGP (e.g., Smrekar et al 2016). Finally it is worth to be considered that the morphological features and values of Gtrs and of Gmfs, has to be periodically reassessed, especially when located in a dynamic environment as the mountain one.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smrekar A, Zorn M, Komac B (2016) Heritage protection through a geomorphologist's eyes: From recording to awareness raising. Acta Geographica Slovenica, 56(1): 123-127.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These areas are of great value, both from the perspective of nature and heritage conservation, as well as with regard to landscape and aesthetic values (Urbanc, Gašperič and Kozina 2015;Smrekar, Polajnar Horvat and Erhartič 2016;Smrekar, Zorn and Komac 2016). It is necessary to pay special attention to them, to develop strategies for their preservation, and to learn from good practices of the past and good examples from other countries (Stanchi et al 2012;Kravchenko et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enoletne in evtrofne združbe prevladujejo na najmlajših odlagališčih, na srednje INTRODUCTION Dolines are the most common, typical and representative landform (Sauro 2003), even more they are considered as the diagnostic karst landform (Ford & williams 1989(Ford & williams , 2007 of karst landscapes. According to this, in conservation policy more attention should be paid to the geodiversity potential of unique landforms (Smrekar et al 2016), habitat biodiversity and conservation. From geographic point of view, dolines can be considered as unique and individual geotop (Giusti 2016) with microclimate characteristics (e.g.…”
Section: ) Mateja Breg Valja�ec Daniela Ribeiro and Andraž čArni: Vegementioning
confidence: 99%