2007
DOI: 10.1515/jls.2007.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hermeneutic resistance: Four test cases for the notion of literary uninterpretability

Abstract: What does it mean to say that a given text is uninterpretable? While there are always the examples of accidental uninterpretability (cases of works that have suffered severe physical damage, texts in real languages not known by readers, references and allusions that were not kept alive as intertexts for other groups), this is not the focus of criticism or hermeneutics. There is a long and important history of purposeful obscurity, of authors who, for whatever reasons, made their texts difficult and challenging… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furkey et al's (2007) book collects argumentative articles on the reading process that innovatively draw together both sociolinguistic and psycholinguistic source frameworks. Other work that argues strongly for re-evaluations includes the always interesting Colin Martindale (2007), the challenging James Mellard (2007) and the important position set out by Leonard Orr (2007).…”
Section: Language Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furkey et al's (2007) book collects argumentative articles on the reading process that innovatively draw together both sociolinguistic and psycholinguistic source frameworks. Other work that argues strongly for re-evaluations includes the always interesting Colin Martindale (2007), the challenging James Mellard (2007) and the important position set out by Leonard Orr (2007).…”
Section: Language Andmentioning
confidence: 99%