2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2021.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hermes: Fault-tolerant middleware for blockchain interoperability

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, blockchain gateways could suffer from crashing due to external attacks. Belchior et al [113] proposed Hermes, a middleware framework for blockchain interoperability that offers crash-recovery features for gateways based on ODAP protocol [114]. Whenever a blockchain gateway is crashed, based on a rollback timeout, the protocol either (i) VOLUME 4, 2016 recovers the gateway operations using its logs within the timeout, or (ii) rollbacks the gateway to its previous state on the affected blockchains.…”
Section: Decentralized Data Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, blockchain gateways could suffer from crashing due to external attacks. Belchior et al [113] proposed Hermes, a middleware framework for blockchain interoperability that offers crash-recovery features for gateways based on ODAP protocol [114]. Whenever a blockchain gateway is crashed, based on a rollback timeout, the protocol either (i) VOLUME 4, 2016 recovers the gateway operations using its logs within the timeout, or (ii) rollbacks the gateway to its previous state on the affected blockchains.…”
Section: Decentralized Data Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Belchior et al [82,83] proposed a middleware for blockchain interoperability known as HERMES. HERMES is a gateway which connects two blockchains for communication.…”
Section: Hermesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• As source and target ledgers typically employ deterministic transaction finality, questions of forks, chain splits, and chain dominance do not emerge as an issue. • On the other hand, the atomicity, consistency, integrity, and durability of the asset transfer itself -as defined by [12] gain primary importance. Integration technologies are emerging to host solutions tailored to this setting, which, compared to cryptocurrency bridging solutions, can translate the different trust models to lower latency, significantly lower protocol complexity, and the absence of either further trust requirements or the introduction of cryptoeconomic incentives.…”
Section: B Bridging Cbdcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since our solution is built on top of the existing SATP, it inherits its properties. Therefore, our CBDC bridging solution guarantees atomicity, consistency, integrity, durability, and termination properties [12]. In addition, it also provides the logging infrastructure for future auditability procedures [9].…”
Section: Failure Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%