2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12893-019-0640-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hernia recurrence and infection rate in elective complex abdominal wall repair using biologic mesh

Abstract: BackgroundElective complex ventral hernia repairs, done using synthetic mesh in patients with comorbidities, can result in mesh related complications such as hernia recurrence or infection. We studied hernia recurrence and surgical site occurrences after elective complex repairs in predominately clean cases using biologic mesh and examined the impact of several comorbidities.MethodsA retrospective chart review was completed on patients who underwent elective repair with biologic mesh in clean/clean-contaminate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…9,11 The use of absorbable synthetic (polyglactin 910, (Vicryl: Ethicon Inc., Somerville, NJ)) or biological (acellular dermal matrix collagen) mesh in clean or contaminated wounds may be associated with less infection risk but higher rates of recurrent hernia. 35 Risk of hernia recurrence is increased in bridging VHR where no fascial closure or component separation is used, and a chimney effect of mesh eventration may be created in the fascial defect. 15,36 The choice of permanent synthetic mesh over biologic or biosynthetic mesh in a contaminated/dirty wound, or as a replacement mesh in an infected hernia wound is controversial.…”
Section: Absorbable Vs Permanent Meshmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,11 The use of absorbable synthetic (polyglactin 910, (Vicryl: Ethicon Inc., Somerville, NJ)) or biological (acellular dermal matrix collagen) mesh in clean or contaminated wounds may be associated with less infection risk but higher rates of recurrent hernia. 35 Risk of hernia recurrence is increased in bridging VHR where no fascial closure or component separation is used, and a chimney effect of mesh eventration may be created in the fascial defect. 15,36 The choice of permanent synthetic mesh over biologic or biosynthetic mesh in a contaminated/dirty wound, or as a replacement mesh in an infected hernia wound is controversial.…”
Section: Absorbable Vs Permanent Meshmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decision to forgo repair of the ventral incisional hernia at the time of index operation was discussed in depth amongst our colleagues perioperatively. Permanent mesh placement is associated with the lowest rates of hernia recurrence; however, the risk of mesh infection leading to increased postoperative morbidity and subsequent operations when placed in a contaminated field is significant [ 6 ]. Complications including hernia recurrence and the need for mesh explant are both increased when permanent mesh is used for hernia repair during the same operation as a concomitant procedure at the same site [ 7 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are comparable to postoperative complications of HR reported in the literature to date using biologic and synthetic mesh: 2.7%-25% for SSI, 2.7%-12.5% for seroma, and 0%-25% for hernia recurrence. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] Almost 1 million ventral and inguinal HR operations are performed annually in the United States, costing up to 10 billion USD per year 1 Currently, there are many different brands of synthetic and biologic meshes on the market in the United States. The plethora of implant options emphasizes that the ideal prosthesis has yet to arrive for HR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%