2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1386-6532(02)00036-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Herpes Consensus PCR test: a useful diagnostic approach to the screening of viral diseases of the central nervous system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This failure can be explained by the inconsistency between the small volume of CSF available and the large number of viruses potentially responsible for meningitis or encephalitis (15). In the first step, the use of a multiplex PCR approach allowed us to broaden the detection of neurotropic viruses (2,6,7,8,22,29,31,32,41,44). Nevertheless, some multiplex PCR requires confirmation by hybridization of the amplicons to specific probes fixed onto mi- (6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This failure can be explained by the inconsistency between the small volume of CSF available and the large number of viruses potentially responsible for meningitis or encephalitis (15). In the first step, the use of a multiplex PCR approach allowed us to broaden the detection of neurotropic viruses (2,6,7,8,22,29,31,32,41,44). Nevertheless, some multiplex PCR requires confirmation by hybridization of the amplicons to specific probes fixed onto mi- (6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasingly, detection of the causative agent using multiplexes in respiratory specimens (16,50), gastrointestinal specimens (7), the eye (14), conditions causing lymphadenopathy (39), cerebrospinal fluid (11,49) are replacing pathogen specific (versus clinical conditions specific) detection (32). Both forms of multiplex testing are useful-the VDL03 (herpesviruses) and VDL04 (RNA viruses) multiplexes used here were designed to allow more efficient testing of infrequently requested agents, thereby allowing more rapid turn-around times, and more efficient testing of commonly requested agents that were determined on the basis of requesting, rather than on the basis of any common pathologies (VDL05 mPCR).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each sample, 80 ng of total nucleic acid extracts was subjected to RT-qPCR using either commercial (Argene EBV R-gene and HSV1 HSV2 VZV [herpes simplex virus 1 and 2 and varicella-zoster virus] R-gene assays; bioMérieux, Verniolle, France) or in-house techniques for the detection of cytomegalovirus (CMV), parvovirus B19 (PVB19), enterovirus (EV), and adenovirus (ADV) (8,(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23). In positive samples, the viral load was expressed as the number of genomic DNA or RNA copies per g of total extracted nucleic acids (DNA and RNA) (6).…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%