2009
DOI: 10.1007/bf03079587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Het meten van kwaliteit van leven bij ernstig demente verpleeghuisbewoners: psychometrische eigenschappen van de QUALID-schaal

Abstract: The Quality of Life in Late Stage Dementia (QUALID) Scale is an instrument to measure quality of life in patients with severe dementia over the last week by means of an interview with a nurse or nurse aid. We interviewed nurse aids on 48 patients with severe dementia in two nursing homes in The Netherlands to determine the psychometric properties of the Dutch translation of the QUALID. Test- retest reliability was good with an Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) of 0.82, (95% Confidence Interval, CI 0.70… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prospectively assessed MSSE may compare better to the retrospectively assessed MSSE than the EOLD–CAD, because the MSSE may be more stable over time (i.e., it includes more stable items in addition to symptoms). Further, comparing slightly different constructs such as observed discomfort and quality of life in retrospect, a CCC of about 0.5 is expected [42]. Nevertheless, our results confirm the validity of the tested instruments in a sense that the retrospective assessments are at least to some degree based on prospectively observed experiences of dying.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The prospectively assessed MSSE may compare better to the retrospectively assessed MSSE than the EOLD–CAD, because the MSSE may be more stable over time (i.e., it includes more stable items in addition to symptoms). Further, comparing slightly different constructs such as observed discomfort and quality of life in retrospect, a CCC of about 0.5 is expected [42]. Nevertheless, our results confirm the validity of the tested instruments in a sense that the retrospective assessments are at least to some degree based on prospectively observed experiences of dying.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…It consists of 9 items with four response options ranging from 0–3. The total score ranges from 0–27, with 0 indicating ‘no discomfort’ and 27 indicating ‘the highest level of discomfort’ [35-37]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the mean (M) and SD as calculated in previous work validating the Dutch version of the QUALID in nursing home residents with advanced dementia (M=7.5, SD=4.9). 41 For the PES, it was analysed and provided for the subgroup of family caregivers with dementia (M=2.9, SD=1.9). 92 Clinically relevant differences in means were defined as 1.5 on the PES and 4 on the QUALID.…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%