Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 2012
DOI: 10.1145/2339530.2339778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HeteRecom

Abstract: Making accurate recommendations for users has become an important function of e-commerce system with the rapid growth of WWW. Conventional recommendation systems usually recommend similar objects, which are of the same type with the query object without exploring the semantics of different similarity measures. In this paper, we organize objects in the recommendation system as a heterogeneous network. Through employing a path-based relevance measure to evaluate the relatedness between any-typed objects and capt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meta-path selection is necessary because trivial meta-paths may include noise and cause extra computational cost. Selecting meta-paths from the HIN can be carried out in three ways: (1) by using users' domain knowledge, which is straightforward but relies heavily on experts' experience and effort [31]; (2) by incorporating all meta-paths within a given length, which avoids information loss but brings noise and leads to low efficiency [32]; and (3) by selecting metapaths with automatic mechanisms. For example, Meng et al propose a greedy algorithm to select meta-paths based on user-provided node pairs [33].…”
Section: Hin Mining For Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meta-path selection is necessary because trivial meta-paths may include noise and cause extra computational cost. Selecting meta-paths from the HIN can be carried out in three ways: (1) by using users' domain knowledge, which is straightforward but relies heavily on experts' experience and effort [31]; (2) by incorporating all meta-paths within a given length, which avoids information loss but brings noise and leads to low efficiency [32]; and (3) by selecting metapaths with automatic mechanisms. For example, Meng et al propose a greedy algorithm to select meta-paths based on user-provided node pairs [33].…”
Section: Hin Mining For Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following, two different similarity measures used in this work are described, Path-Sim and HeteSim. Relevance recommendation aims at identifying multi-typed items related to a query object in terms of meaningful semantic relationships [3]. Finally ranking in HINs allows to identify the most relevant multi-typed nodes according to the selected meta-path [2].…”
Section: Background On Hins and Meta-pathsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed algorithm is related to the relevance recommendation algorithm HeteRecom [3], which automatically identifies relevant semantic meta-paths in HINs, starting from a query node. However, most of the possible semantic metapaths are not meaningful in this scenario, due to the high uncertainty in the EG links.…”
Section: Evidence Recommendation Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zhang et al have formalized the recommendations over a heterogeneous social network as a ranking problem and proposed a random walk model to estimate the importance of each object in the heterogeneous network. As an alternative to conventional recommendation systems that recommend similar objects of the same type, Shi et al have developed HeteRecom to evaluate the relatedness between any‐typed objects using a path‐based relevance measure, which can recommend similar objects of the same type and also related objects of different types.…”
Section: Experimental Developments and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%