2016
DOI: 10.1201/9781315372440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heteroepitaxy of Semiconductors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lattice mismatch between MoS 2 and HOPG can be defined using the simple formula f ¼ asÀae ae , where a s and a e are the lattice constant of the substrate and the over-layer, respectively. 41 In the MoS 2 /HOPG case, the mismatch is quite large: (0.246-0.315 nm)/ 0.315 nm = 22%. However, the strain energy could be reduced by skewed stacking the MoS 2 and HOPG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The lattice mismatch between MoS 2 and HOPG can be defined using the simple formula f ¼ asÀae ae , where a s and a e are the lattice constant of the substrate and the over-layer, respectively. 41 In the MoS 2 /HOPG case, the mismatch is quite large: (0.246-0.315 nm)/ 0.315 nm = 22%. However, the strain energy could be reduced by skewed stacking the MoS 2 and HOPG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Given the 8% lattice mismatch as well as the 84% difference in thermal expansion coefficient, growing InP directly on silicon typically results in a large density of misfit and threading dislocations, detrimental for optoelectronic devices 15 . A common approach to accommodate the mismatch uses a several micrometer thick buffer layer [28][29][30] .…”
Section: Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, considerable hurdles need to be overcome. When directly growing III-V semiconductors on silicon substrates, the large lattice mismatch (εInP/Si = 8.06 %), the difference in thermal expansion and the different polarity of the materials result in large densities of crystalline defects including misfit and threading dislocations, twins, stacking faults and anti-phase boundaries, strongly degrading the performance and reducing the lifetime of any device fabricated in the as-grown layers 15 . Several routes to overcome these issues have been proposed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on both the nature of the substrate and the deposition conditions, porphyrins can give rise to a multitude of aggregate morphologies, ranging from 1-D nanowires to 2-D nanoplatelets and 3-D nanocrystallites . In the framework of classical modes of film growth, the layer-plus-island (Stranski–Krastanov) progression is the most recurrent in organic overlayers deposited on crystalline substrates. , This occurrence is motivated by the fact that a perfect commensurism between the substrate surface lattice and the molecular organic overlayer is hardly attained. Hence, the strict 2-D growth of the overlayer, when it occurs, is confined to one to three monolayers. As a whole, this is referred to as the wetting layer : efforts in its identification and study constitute a recent topic of significant debates. , In the case of porphyrins, due to their discoidal shape, the wetting layer can be constituted by molecules arranged edge-on or flat-on.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%