2014
DOI: 10.3982/qe131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneity and risk sharing in village economies

Abstract: We show how to use panel data on household consumption to directly estimate households’ risk preferences. Specifically, we measure heterogeneity in risk aversion among households in Thai villages using a full risk-sharing model, which we then test allowing for this heterogeneity. There is substantial, statistically significant heterogeneity in estimated risk preferences. Full insurance cannot be rejected. As the risk sharing, as-if-complete-markets theory might predict, estimated risk preferences are unrelated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We echo previous work which finds that full risk sharing is rejected, but not by much, and indeed find that the moral hazard regime is not inconsistent with the rural income and consumption data, where limited commitment also does well, and with the joint business and consumption data in our urban sample. We also recover more sophisticated contract theoretic regimes (moral hazard constrained credit, tied with full information) if we restrict attention to family or gift/loan networks data, confirming related work byChiappori et al (2013) and Kinnan and Townsend (2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We echo previous work which finds that full risk sharing is rejected, but not by much, and indeed find that the moral hazard regime is not inconsistent with the rural income and consumption data, where limited commitment also does well, and with the joint business and consumption data in our urban sample. We also recover more sophisticated contract theoretic regimes (moral hazard constrained credit, tied with full information) if we restrict attention to family or gift/loan networks data, confirming related work byChiappori et al (2013) and Kinnan and Townsend (2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Compared to the whole sample results and likelihoods in Table 5, with consumption and income cross-sectional data alone, this networked sub-sample allows us to narrow down the best fitting regime as moral hazard (tied with FI). Evidently, family networks help in consumption smoothing as inChiappori et al (2013). LC is, however, the best-fitting regime in the (c,q) sub-sample of unrelated households (tied with MH, but note the small number of observations).…”
Section: Application To Thai Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Using the monthly panel data from the Townsend Thai project, Chiappori et al (2014) seek to test this benchmark allocation of efficiency, taking advantage of the unusual length of the panel. Again, theory suggests that household consumption should depend on time fixed effects that capture village aggregate risk/consumption.…”
Section: Risk Sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%