2022
DOI: 10.1017/s0954579421001668
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneity in caregiving-related early adversity: Creating stable dimensions and subtypes

Abstract: Early psychosocial adversities exist at many levels, including caregiving-related, extrafamilial, and sociodemographic, which despite their high interrelatedness may have unique impacts on development. In this paper, we focus on caregiving-related early adversities (crEAs) and parse the heterogeneity of crEAs via data reduction techniques that identify experiential cooccurrences. Using network science, we characterized crEA cooccurrences to represent the comorbidity of crEA experiences across a sample of schoo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(83 reference statements)
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is likely that researchers will be increasingly interested in using these highly detailed data to generate dimensions that reflect interactions between specific features of stress. These approaches are likely to require complex multivariate and data-driven approaches (e.g., machine learning-based approaches) that will afford analysis of age- and developmental time period-specific analyses (e.g., Herzog et al, 2020; Nikolaidis et al, 2022; Sicorello et al, 2021). In this vein, depending on the specific research question of interest, we encourage researchers to modify the current “template” of the DISTAL-E to facilitate the assessment of varied additional dimensions of interest that may be pertinent to a diverse array of research questions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is likely that researchers will be increasingly interested in using these highly detailed data to generate dimensions that reflect interactions between specific features of stress. These approaches are likely to require complex multivariate and data-driven approaches (e.g., machine learning-based approaches) that will afford analysis of age- and developmental time period-specific analyses (e.g., Herzog et al, 2020; Nikolaidis et al, 2022; Sicorello et al, 2021). In this vein, depending on the specific research question of interest, we encourage researchers to modify the current “template” of the DISTAL-E to facilitate the assessment of varied additional dimensions of interest that may be pertinent to a diverse array of research questions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A complete description of the RBC samples can be found elsewhere (Hoffmann, Moore, Axelrud, Tottenham, Zuo, et al, 2022). Briefly, it contains phenotypic data from six large-scale developmental imaging cohorts, which are the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort (PNC) (Satterthwaite et al, 2016), the Brazilian High-Risk Cohort Study for Mental Conditions (BHRCS) (Salum et al, 2015), the Healthy Brain Network (HBN) (Alexander et al, 2017), the Nathan Kline Institute-Rockland Sample (NKI-RS) (Nooner et al, 2012), the developmental component of the Chinese Color Nest Project (devCCNP) (Liu et al, 2020), and the Parents and Children Coming Together project (PACCT; PIs: Tottenham & Milham) (Nikolaidis et al, 2022). Healthy Brain Network is treatmentseeking samples.…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). For example, interventions can be tailored based on an individual’s profile of exposure to adversity across multiple dimensions (Cohodes et al, 2021; Cohodes et al, 2023; Nikolaidis et al, 2022), based on specific patterns of caregiver–child interactions (Kitt et al, 2022), or based on specific caregiver-level factors such as parental symptomatology following dyadic exposure to adversity (Hagan et al, 2017). We specifically highlight the importance of considering family-level processes in treatment selection and optimization given the multifaceted influence of caregivers on resilience-related processes reviewed here (Garner et al, 2021).…”
Section: Implications For Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%