Colloidal
quantum dots (QDs) of I–III–VI ternary
compounds such as copper indium sulfide (CIS) and copper indium selenide
(CISe) have been under intense investigation due to both their unusual
photophysical properties and considerable technological utility. These
materials feature a toxic-element-free composition, a tunable bandgap
that covers near-infrared and visible spectral energies, and a highly
efficient photoluminescence (PL) whose spectrum is located in the
reabsorption-free intragap region. These properties make them attractive
for light-emission and light-harvesting applications including photovoltaics
and luminescent solar concentrators. Despite a large body of literature
on device-related studies of CISe(S) QDs, the understanding of their
fundamental photophysical properties is surprisingly poor. Two particular
subjects that are still heavily debated in the literature include
the mechanism(s) for strong intragap emission and the reason(s) for
a poorly defined (featureless) absorption edge, which often “tails”
below the nominal bandgap. Here, we address these questions by conducting
comprehensive spectroscopic studies of CIS QD samples with varied
Cu-to-In ratios using resonant PL and PL excitation, femtosecond transient
absorption, and magnetic circular dichroism measurements. These studies
reveal a strong effect of stoichiometry on the concentration of Cu1+
vs Cu2+ defects (occurring as
CuIn
″ and CuCu
• species, respectively), and their effects on QD optical properties.
In particular, we demonstrate that the increase in the relative amount
of Cu2+
vs Cu1+ centers suppresses
intragap absorption associated with Cu1+ states and sharpens
band-edge absorption. In addition, we show that both Cu1+ and Cu2+ centers are emissive but are characterized by
distinct activation mechanisms and slightly different emission energies
due to different crystal lattice environments. An important overall
conclusion of this study is that the relative importance of the Cu2+
vs Cu1+ emission/absorption
channels can be controlled by tuning the Cu-to-In ratio, suggesting
that the control of sample stoichiometry represents a powerful tool
for achieving functionalities (e.g., strong intragap
emission) that are not accessible with ideal, defect-free materials.