2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-59710-8_76
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneity Measurement of Cardiac Tissues Leveraging Uncertainty Information from Image Segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We performed molecular docking simulations on the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) (Protein Data Bank ID: 6M71), and the main protease (Mpro) (PDB ID: 6Y2E) of SARS-CoV-2, using default settings in the Protein–Ligand ANT System (PLANTS) (Korb et al 2009 ), as described elsewhere (Copertino et al 2021 b). The ligand docking sites were specified, respectively, as the catalytic sites determined by Zhang et al ( 2020 a) (Gln189) and Gao et al ( 2020 ) (Asp623), using an estimated radius of 10 Å around the specified residues. The resulting protein–ligand scores (PLANTS scores), calculated using the CHEMPLP algorithm, reflect the energy change when ligands and proteins come together, with values less than − 80.00 suggesting effective ligand–protein interactions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed molecular docking simulations on the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) (Protein Data Bank ID: 6M71), and the main protease (Mpro) (PDB ID: 6Y2E) of SARS-CoV-2, using default settings in the Protein–Ligand ANT System (PLANTS) (Korb et al 2009 ), as described elsewhere (Copertino et al 2021 b). The ligand docking sites were specified, respectively, as the catalytic sites determined by Zhang et al ( 2020 a) (Gln189) and Gao et al ( 2020 ) (Asp623), using an estimated radius of 10 Å around the specified residues. The resulting protein–ligand scores (PLANTS scores), calculated using the CHEMPLP algorithm, reflect the energy change when ligands and proteins come together, with values less than − 80.00 suggesting effective ligand–protein interactions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their model contained a multi-modal training process that involved both en-face OCT and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) to provide the intensity and geometric profiles. [23] trained a fully supervised segmentation network for cardiac tissue segmentation and used model uncertainty to estimate tissue heterogeneity. Existing work mainly relies upon fully supervised learning techniques.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current automated analysis on cardiac OCT images is mostly based on fully supervised learning models [22], [23], [34]. These models were limited and suffered from the drawback of manual workload in the labeling process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%