2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2018.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneity of environments in a coastal lagoon mouth by the comparison between living and dead benthic foraminiferal assemblages (Ria de Aveiro Portugal)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The living strategy of foraminifera also plays a role, for example epibenthic foraminifera, living at the sediment-water interface, are particularly prone to transport (Jorissen and Whittling, 1999;Murray, 2006). In areas dominated by strong current regimes, such as estuaries or coastal lagoon mouths, differences between DAs and LAs are known to be considerable (Alve and Murray, 1995;Martins et al, 2018). Therefore, this study documents, for the first time, the differences between LAs and DAs and the impact of current dynamics on foraminiferal distributions in a CWC environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The living strategy of foraminifera also plays a role, for example epibenthic foraminifera, living at the sediment-water interface, are particularly prone to transport (Jorissen and Whittling, 1999;Murray, 2006). In areas dominated by strong current regimes, such as estuaries or coastal lagoon mouths, differences between DAs and LAs are known to be considerable (Alve and Murray, 1995;Martins et al, 2018). Therefore, this study documents, for the first time, the differences between LAs and DAs and the impact of current dynamics on foraminiferal distributions in a CWC environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…A number of these have been proposed to explain differences between living foraminiferal (biocoensis) assemblages (LAs) and dead foraminiferal (thanatocoensis) assemblages (DAs) at the sediment surface (Murray, 2006 and references therein). Life processes, such as species-specific reproduction rates and seasonality, explain in part these disparities (Murray, 2006;Martins et al, 2018). Post-mortem processes, such as test transport, physical breakage, dissolution, bioerosion and bioturbation also have an important impact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These species have short life cycles and they are able to rapidly increase their abundance when the environmental conditions are favourable (Martins et al, 2018). Permanently attached forms belonging to morphotype A (permanently attached forms), A* (long-living sessile attached forms) and SB (sessile, symbiont bearing) were poorly represented in all the investigated samples.…”
Section: Epiphytic Assemblagesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The dissimilarity between living and dead benthic foraminiferal assemblages in the shallow coastal area of Esperance Bay could be attributed to processes of sedimentary dynamic and the instability of physicochemical parameters that are unfavorable factors for the development of large living foraminiferal communities. The relationship between dead and living assemblages has not been fully understood yet, due to the small number of investigations (Dimiza et al, 2016;Martins et al, 2016Martins et al, , 2018Martins et al, , 2019a.…”
Section: Samples For Foraminiferal Investigation Were Preserved In Etmentioning
confidence: 99%