2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.margeo.2020.106136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneity of rhodolith beds expressed in backscatter data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The combination of visual surveys and acoustic data represented the best approach for the identification of RBs, and the high backscatter registered in association with this habitat was in accordance with recent literature (e.g., [8,67,81]). However, backscatter can vary according to many factors such as, among the others, incident angle, sediment type, grain size, seabed slope and roughness [81,82], thus ground truth is essential for a proper interpretation.…”
Section: Rhodolith Beds Variability From Small To Large Scalesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The combination of visual surveys and acoustic data represented the best approach for the identification of RBs, and the high backscatter registered in association with this habitat was in accordance with recent literature (e.g., [8,67,81]). However, backscatter can vary according to many factors such as, among the others, incident angle, sediment type, grain size, seabed slope and roughness [81,82], thus ground truth is essential for a proper interpretation.…”
Section: Rhodolith Beds Variability From Small To Large Scalesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The total coverage of the sea bottom is achieved by using MBES and SSS systems, which, through swath type scanning of the seafloor, can cover vast areas of the bottom in brief time. MBES is not only used primarily for collecting bathymetry data but, through the backscatter of the acoustic signal, may also produce information about the lithology and HT of the bottom equivalent, if not better, to those of the SSS (Collier and Brown, 2005;Le Bas and Huvenne, 2009;Di Maida et al, 2011;Papatheodorou et al, 2012;Innangi et al, 2015;Lacharitéet al, 2018;Rocha et al, 2020;Prampolini et al, 2021). In order to produce the final map, this acoustic backscatter data have to be verified and linked to a habitat or bottom type (BT) by using ground-truthing data, like sediment and biota sampling and an underwater video (Kostylev et al, 2001;Solan et al, 2003;Hühnerbach et al, 2007;Innangi et al, 2019;Sañéet al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uncalibrated backscatter intensity values vary from -14 dB to -29 dB. (Rocha et al, 2020), comprising 73 km² of multibeam data and footage from 88 dropcam sites.…”
Section: Forgotten Reefs (Recifes Esquecidos)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In MPA Costa das Algas, the regional habitat map showed rhodolith classes covering 100% of the area. A higher resolution approach allowed to achieve a higher level of detail in the incised valleys, as well as to acknowledge regions with different rhodolith coverage (as proposed by Rocha et al, 2020). The Forgotten Reefs area is not shown in the regional bathymetric map (1:50000 scale).…”
Section: Multi-design Approach: From Broad To Finer Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%