2020
DOI: 10.3386/w27211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneous Actions, Beliefs, Constraints and Risk Tolerance During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract: Authors are listed alphabetically. We thank SafeGraph Inc. for data access, Max Resnick and Helen Wang for excellent research assistance and Lillian Chen for survey management. The University of Michigan IRB approved this study (HUM00148129, HUM00180582, and HUM00180640). The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
74
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
7
74
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Barrios and Hochberg (2020) show differences between Republican and Democratic areas in the frequency of COVID-related queries on Google and in movement patterns as measured in GPS data from a different source than the one we use. Fan et al (2020) find differences in risk perceptions and social distancing in GPS and survey data across political parties and other demographics. Our results are broadly consistent with these other studies, but we believe that our paper contributes to the discussion through a unique combination of observational data analysis, survey work, and a theoretical model that helps understand the economic implications of our results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Barrios and Hochberg (2020) show differences between Republican and Democratic areas in the frequency of COVID-related queries on Google and in movement patterns as measured in GPS data from a different source than the one we use. Fan et al (2020) find differences in risk perceptions and social distancing in GPS and survey data across political parties and other demographics. Our results are broadly consistent with these other studies, but we believe that our paper contributes to the discussion through a unique combination of observational data analysis, survey work, and a theoretical model that helps understand the economic implications of our results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Compared to men, women are more likely to recognize COVID-10 as a threat to health( Galasso et al, 2020 ) and take precautions on mitigating the risk of COVID-19 infection, including limiting social gatherings and putting on personal protective equipment. ( Fan et al, 2020 ) While women have lower infection and mortality rates due to COVID-19, they are more likely to be affected by the restriction measures associated with the closure of businesses and schools. ( Alon et al, 2020 ) Compared to other age groups, voter turnout is usually higher among those 65 years of age and over,( Mirsa, 2019 ) who are more likely impacted by federal-level policies associated with retirement and Medicare benefits, and less affected by potential barriers to voting due to relocation that is more common among other age groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, females are more risk averse, concerned about health consequences, and in favor of activity-restraining public policy measures than males. These differences allow females to be more compliant with the social rules for health-promoting behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic such as washing one's hands, maintaining distance from others, and staying at home [30,31]. Social capital theory points out that in high-trust societies, compliance to rules tend to be strong, and any deviations tend to be sanctioned promptly [1,25].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%