2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneous catalytic transesterification of phosphatidylcholine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be due to the larger particle size of the catalyst and the contribution from the microscale zirconia support. In spite of this, the surface area of CMSS is comparable to values for pure Ca(OCH 3 ) 2 catalysts reported in literature [11]. Furthermore, the average pore diameter and total pore volume of the catalyst were 174 Å and 0.145 cm 3 g -1 , respectively.…”
Section: Fig 2 X-ray Diffraction Patterns Of Cmss Catalystsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may be due to the larger particle size of the catalyst and the contribution from the microscale zirconia support. In spite of this, the surface area of CMSS is comparable to values for pure Ca(OCH 3 ) 2 catalysts reported in literature [11]. Furthermore, the average pore diameter and total pore volume of the catalyst were 174 Å and 0.145 cm 3 g -1 , respectively.…”
Section: Fig 2 X-ray Diffraction Patterns Of Cmss Catalystsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The first reflection plane at 2h = 10.7°is the characteristic peak of calcium methoxide, being responsible for the transesterification reaction [11]. This indicates that the catalyst was well integrated into the support's matrix.…”
Section: Fig 2 X-ray Diffraction Patterns Of Cmss Catalystmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Furthermore, there was another research that investigate the performance of conventional calcium methoxide catalyst via the following reaction conditions: 150 min, 1:4.5 of oil/methanol ratio, 1.5% of catalyst loading and 65 • C to give about 90-95% of biodiesel yield (Gryglewicz, 1999). Some other researchers able to obtain 94 ± 2% of FAME yield through 240 min reaction duration, 12:1 methanol to oil molar ratio, 3% catalyst concentration and 60 • C of reaction temperature (Balasubramanian and Obbard, 2011). However, there was no statistical study has been performed on the respective solid heterogeneous catalyst.…”
Section: Statistical Study Via Response Surface Methodologymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For a basic catalyst, either sodium hydroxide (NaOH) or potassium hydroxide (KOH) should be used with methanol or ethanol as well as any kind of oils, refine, crude or frying (Rajesh and Jeffrey, 2011;Kai et al, 2010;Khalisanni et al, 2008). In this process it is better to produce the alcoxy before the reaction to obtain a better global efficiency (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%