2009
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneous characteristics of streambed saturated hydraulic conductivity of the Touchet River, south eastern Washington, USA

Abstract: Abstract:Traditionally a streambed is treated as a layer of uniform thickness and low saturated hydraulic conductivity (K) in surfaceand ground-water studies. Recent findings have shown a high level of spatial heterogeneity within a streambed and such heterogeneity directly affects surface-and ground-water exchange and can have ecological implications for biogeochemical transformations, nutrient cycling, organic matter decomposition, and reproduction of gravel spawning fish. In this study a detailed field inve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the larger (up to several kilometre) stream reach to sub-catchment scale, exchange fluxes between groundwater and surface water can be strongly affected by larger geological heterogeneities in the alluvial aquifer and the resulting groundwater flow field (Cardenas and Wilson, 2006;Fleckenstein et al, 2006;Engdahl et al, 2010;Frei et al, 2009). At smaller, plot to stream reach scales, however, exchange fluxes over the aquifer-river interface appear to be strongly controlled by spatial patterns of streambed hydraulic conductivity (Genereux et al, 2008;Leek et al, 2009;Calver, 2001;Rosenberry, 2008;Käser et al, 2009) and streambed topography (Storey et al, 2003;Boano et al, 2006Boano et al, , 2010Cardenas, 2009;Cardenas et al, 2008;Kasahara and Hill, 2008;Tonina and Buffington, 2007).…”
Section: S Krause Et Al: Investigating Patterns and Controls Of Gromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the larger (up to several kilometre) stream reach to sub-catchment scale, exchange fluxes between groundwater and surface water can be strongly affected by larger geological heterogeneities in the alluvial aquifer and the resulting groundwater flow field (Cardenas and Wilson, 2006;Fleckenstein et al, 2006;Engdahl et al, 2010;Frei et al, 2009). At smaller, plot to stream reach scales, however, exchange fluxes over the aquifer-river interface appear to be strongly controlled by spatial patterns of streambed hydraulic conductivity (Genereux et al, 2008;Leek et al, 2009;Calver, 2001;Rosenberry, 2008;Käser et al, 2009) and streambed topography (Storey et al, 2003;Boano et al, 2006Boano et al, , 2010Cardenas, 2009;Cardenas et al, 2008;Kasahara and Hill, 2008;Tonina and Buffington, 2007).…”
Section: S Krause Et Al: Investigating Patterns and Controls Of Gromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This pattern of fine sediment deposition (typically sand-and silt-sized fractions of B2 mm; Wentworth, 1922;Jones et al, 2012) directly influences the structure and composition of invertebrate communities (Brunke & Gonser, 1999) but also the nature of vertical hydrological exchange (Leek et al, 2009;Hartwig & Borchardt, 2015;Datry et al, 2015). Consequently, the dynamic pattern of vertical hydraulic exchange exerts a strong influence on physical and chemical conditions such as temperature, oxygen concentrations and the residence time of water (Olsen & Townsend, 2003;Krause et al, 2011b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that the direction of the vertical flow of the river is not always the same, according to Leek et al (2009). They report that the hydraulic gradient can present spatial variation in its behavior at nearby locations.…”
Section: Reading the Difference Of Hydraulic Headmentioning
confidence: 99%