2019 Spring Simulation Conference (SpringSim) 2019
DOI: 10.23919/springsim.2019.8732873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneous Crowd Simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We introduced extensions to the CPD model for crowd modeling and simulation that address the addition of vehicles, motorcycles, and obstacles entities into a single system, making it heterogeneous. 49 We added the Minkowski sum approach, flexibility for adding foreign objects and simulating traffic scenarios. The developed engine displays potential to simulate multiple scenarios of vehicle and crowd interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We introduced extensions to the CPD model for crowd modeling and simulation that address the addition of vehicles, motorcycles, and obstacles entities into a single system, making it heterogeneous. 49 We added the Minkowski sum approach, flexibility for adding foreign objects and simulating traffic scenarios. The developed engine displays potential to simulate multiple scenarios of vehicle and crowd interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction between a vehicle and pedestrians in very close contact is also modelled with these repulsive forces in [71], [78]. In a simulation case of an ambulance trying to pass through a crowded scene of pedestrians, a collision penalty force is exerted whenever the vehicle and the pedestrians penetrate into each other's personal space.…”
Section: A Explicit Interaction Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other difference in the interaction formulation of a Social Force Model is caused by considering the difference in geometry and size of the vehicle compared to a pedestrian, which affects the calculation of the distance between the two agents [17], [72], [75]. The size of the agent also impacts the personal space (e.g., the space around each agent into which any encroachment feels uncomfortable) [71], [78] and conflict zone (e.g., A distance below which there is a risk of collision) [68], [77] of a pedestrian versus a vehicle. While pedestrians are basically considered to have a circular shape in SFM, vehicles are commonly modelled as an ellipse.…”
Section: A Interaction Of Agents In Sfmmentioning
confidence: 99%