2005
DOI: 10.1007/11575467_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneous Fixed Points with Application to Points-To Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In future we propose to explore this idea in detail. We would also like to extend the proposed ideas to non-bit-vector frameworks like points-to analysis [Emami et al 1994;Kanade et al 2005]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In future we propose to explore this idea in detail. We would also like to extend the proposed ideas to non-bit-vector frameworks like points-to analysis [Emami et al 1994;Kanade et al 2005]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If there are m atomic propositions in M ′ then we get a system of m simultaneous equations. If the system is h-monotonic [KKS05] or simply monotonic then a solution to the equations can be computed iteratively and it completely determines the labeling of the transformed Kripke structure.…”
Section: Transformations Of Kripke Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Points-to relations are computed by identifying locations corresponding to the leftand right-hand sides of a pointer assignment and taking their cartesian product [10,11]. The points-to pairs of locations that are modified are removed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The points-to pairs of locations that are modified are removed. May-points-to information at n contains the points-to pairs that hold along some path reaching n whereas must-points-to information contains the pairs that hold along every path reaching n (hence a pointer can have at most one pointee) [11]. Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%