Heterogeneous Impacts of Conditional Cash Transfers: Evidence from Nicaragua

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in Heterogeneous Impacts of Conditional Cash Transfers: Evidence from NicaraguaAna C. Dammert D I S C U S S I O N P A P E R S E R I E S ABSTRACT Heterogeneous Impacts of Conditional Cash Transfers: Evidence from NicaraguaIn the last decade, the most popular policy tool used to increase human capital in developing countries has been the conditional cash transfer program. A large literature has shown significant mean impacts on schooling, health, and child labor. This paper examines heterogeneous effects using random-assignment data from the Red de Proteccion Social in rural Nicaragua. Using interactions between the targeting criteria and the treatment indicator, estimates suggest that children located in more impoverished localities experienced a larger impact of the program on schooling in 2001, but this finding is reversed in 2002. Estimated quantile treatment effects indicate that there is considerable heterogeneity in the impacts of the program on the distribution of food expenditures, as well as total expenditures. In particular, households at the lower end of the expenditure distribution experienced a smaller increase in expenditures. This paper also presents evidence of the rank invariance assumption to help clarify the interpretation of the quantile treatment effect in the development literature context. JEL Classification: O15, I38

Heterogeneous impact of the “Seguro Popular” program on the utilization of obstetrical services in Mexico, 2001–2006: A multinomial probit model with a discrete endogenous variable

“…In addition, we tested the effects of interactions between treatment variables and other explanatory variables. Having specified a parametric joint distribution for the error terms ( ε 0, ε 1 , ε 2 ), we did not explore more generalized nonparametric procedures, such as quantile treatment effects regression (Djebbari and Smith (2005); Dammert (2007)), and thus our analysis does not capture the full extent of heterogeneity of program impact due to variations in unobservables.…”

“…Third, we contribute to the nascent but expanding body of work on the heterogeneous impacts of policy interventions in the developing world, including the effect of antiretroviral treatment on labor force participation in Western Kenya (Thirumurthy, Zivin et al (2006)), the effect of conditional cash transfers on schooling and nutrition in Nicaragua (Dammert (2007)) and Mexico (Djebbari and Smith (2005); Chávez-Martín del Campo (2006)). Here, we find that the quantitative impact of the SP program varied with the woman’s education and health, as well as the assets and location (rural versus urban) of the household.…”

Heterogeneous impacts in PROGRESA

“…Biddle, Boden and Reville (2004) investigate heterogeneous effects of workplace injuries on earnings using a variant of the random coefficient model that we apply below to PROGRESA. In a developing country context, Dammert (2007) examines quantile treatment effects in a conditional cash transfer program in Nicaragua and, in work conducted independently of our own, Chavez-Martin del Campo (2006) does the same for PROGRESA.…”

The Income Elasticity of Child Labour: Do Cash Transfers Have an Impact on the Poorest Children?

“…A few impact evaluation studies, mainly focused on conditional cash transfers (CCTs) in Latin America, address the issue of heterogeneity by income. They tend to find a larger reduction of child labour and increase in school enrolment among the children belonging to the relatively poorer household (Galiani andMcEwan 2013 andGlewwe andOlinto 2004 for the Honduran PRAF-II, Edmonds and Schady 2012 for the Bono de Desarollo Humano in Ecuador, Sparrow 2007 for the Jaringam Pengaman Social in Indonesia, Dammert 2009 for the Social Safety Net in Nicaragua).…”