2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2012.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneous information quality; strategic complementarities and optimal policy design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the presence of non‐updating firms introduces the possibility that either full transparency or some degree of partial transparency might be optimal. In this regard, as noted in Section 3, the conclusions echo those arrived at in James and Lawler (), which shares the feature of the current model that the quality of information differs across groups of agents.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, the presence of non‐updating firms introduces the possibility that either full transparency or some degree of partial transparency might be optimal. In this regard, as noted in Section 3, the conclusions echo those arrived at in James and Lawler (), which shares the feature of the current model that the quality of information differs across groups of agents.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“… In James and Lawler (), the private sector is assumed to comprise two sets of agents, of equal size, distinguished by the precision of the private signals that they observe; as in Cornand and Heinemann (), each agent observes a public signal, disclosed by the policymaker, with a fixed probability common to both sets of agents.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The principles outlined in the preceding discussion are also central to the conclusions drawn in James and Lawler (). In each of these studies, abstract models incorporating heterogeneous information are applied to examine the social welfare consequences of public disclosure of information that is otherwise private to the policymaker in the presence of optimal stabilization policy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%