2021
DOI: 10.1002/smtd.202100188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneous Interface Design for Enhanced Sodium Storage: Sb Quantum Dots Confined by Functional Carbon

Abstract: Figure 8. a) Band structure of a) SbQD@C and c) Sb (R-3m); the total density of states and partial density of states for b) SbQD@C and d) Sb (R-3m).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, as in Fig. 4 d, the peaks located at 528.7 and 538.1 eV are attributed to the Sb 0 [ 36 ], which reveals the existence of metallic Sb. Additionally, the peaks of C 1 s (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, as in Fig. 4 d, the peaks located at 528.7 and 538.1 eV are attributed to the Sb 0 [ 36 ], which reveals the existence of metallic Sb. Additionally, the peaks of C 1 s (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cause of declined work functions is largely ascribed to the existence of the BiOC bond inducing the interface dipoles and changing the phase interfacial electron clouds arrangement. [25] The distinct difference in work functions between Bulk Bi and 2D Bi@ NOC was consistent with their sharp contrast of rate performance and K + diffusion coefficient.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In the first cyclic voltammetry (CV) cycle at a scan rate of 0.2 mV s −1 ( Figure A), two cathodic peaks located at 0.45 and 0.1 V versus Na/Na + might be attributed to the step‐wise alloying of Na with Sb(Sn)@C and the formation of solid‐electrolyte interphase, respectively. [ 24 ] In the subsequent scans, two cathodic peaks (0.4 and 0.16 V) and one anodic peak (0.85 V) were observed, [ 25 ] reflecting the dealloying process. [ 26 ] The CV profiles for the Sb and Sb(Sn) electrodes was also tested as shown in Figure S8 (Supporting Information), and the shift of the peak position of Sb was more significant than that of Sb(Sn) and Sb(Sn)@C, suggesting more polarization in the former than the latter.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%