“…Our results also build on the nascent behavioral public economics literature describing optimal policy with behavioral agents (e.g., Bernheim and Rangel, 2009;Mullainathan, Schwartzstein and Congdon, 2012;Taubinsky and Rees-Jones, 2018;Farhi and Gabaix, 2020;List et al, 2022). Much of the previous work focuses on optimal allocation policies, such as quantity standards or taxes, to correct distorted product choice (e.g., Allcott, Mullainathan and Taubinsky, 2014;Allcott, Lockwood and Taubinsky, 2019;Houde and Myers, 2019), or, in some cases, on policies that reduce information frictions (e.g., Handel, Kolstad and Spinnewijn, 2019). We add to this literature by considering a non-traditional policy designed specifically to address mental gaps in information acquisition.…”