Heterogeneous taxonomic resolution of cytochrome b gene identification of bats from Argentina: Implications for field studies

Abstract

Bats are among the most diverse, widespread, and abundant mammals. In Argentina, 67 species of bats have been recorded, belonging to 5 families and 29 genera. These high levels of biodiversity are likely to complicate identification at fieldwork, especially between closely related species, where external morphology-based approaches are the only immediate means for a priori species assignment. The use of molecular markers can enhance species identification, and acquires particular relevance in capture-release studies. In this study, we discuss the extent of the use of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene for species identification, comparing external morphology identification with a molecular phylogenetic classification based on this marker, under the light of current bat systematics. We analyzed 33 samples collected in an eco-epidemiological survey in the province of Santa Fe (Argentina). We further sequenced 27 museum vouchers to test the accuracy of cytochrome b -based phylogenies in taxonomic identification of bats occurring in the Pampean/Chacoan regions of Argentina. The cytochrome b gene was successfully amplified in all Molossid and Vespertilionid species except for Eptesicus, for which we designed a new reverse primer. The resulting Bayesian phylogeny was congruent with current systematics. Cytochrome b proved useful for species-level delimitation in non-conflicting genera (Eumops, Dasypterus, Molossops) and has infrageneric resolution in more complex lineages (Eptesicus, Myotis, Molossus). We discuss four sources of incongruence that may act separately or in combination: 1) molecular processes, 2) biology, 3) limitations in identification, and 4) errors in the current taxonomy. The present study confirms the general applicability of cytochrome b -based phylogenies in eco-epidemiological studies, but its resolution and reliability depend mainly, but not solely, on the level of genetic differentiation within each bat genus.

Cross-Species Transmission of Bat Coronaviruses in the Americas: Contrasting Patterns between Alphacoronavirus and Betacoronavirus

“…It is worth noting that the general structure of the viral phylogenies inferred in this study showed high levels of resolution with highly supported nodes. Another aspect that should be taken into consideration is the uncertainty in host species classification due to procedural errors or to the cryptic nature of several bat species that cannot be unambiguously identified from their external morphology ( 31 ). This issue was solved by centering the analysis on genus and family levels ( Fig.…”

The Role of Molossidae and Vespertilionidae in Shaping the Diversity of Alphacoronaviruses in the Americas

“…All association tests and ancestral host reconstructions were based on bat genus and family. At the species level, there could be high rates of misidentification, especially in genera such as Molossus and Myotis , where there is an ongoing taxonomic revision, with several cryptic species that cannot be identified from external morphology and/or traditional single- or multilocus approaches ( 33 ).…”

Strong population genetic structure and cryptic diversity in the Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus)

“…Given the relatively high microsatellite differentiation between MD and western populations, we generated sequence data for the cytochrome b (cyt b) gene to improve the resolution of deeper historical patterns of divergence. Cyt b has been demonstrated to perform well at species level delimitation in bats including Eumops (Caraballo et al 2020). We sequenced a subset of 49 samples including (13 MD, 11 BW, 17 CC, and 8 PC).…”