2010
DOI: 10.1002/crat.200900645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneous versus bulk nucleation of lysozyme crystals

Abstract: Heterogeneous (on-glass) protein crystal nucleation was separated from the bulk one in systems of thin protein solution layers, confined between two glass plates of custom made quasi two-dimensional all-glass cells, as well as by applying forced protein solution flow. Two commercial samples of hen-egg-white lysozyme, Seikagaku and Sigma were used as model proteins. Applying the classical technique of separation in time of nucleation and growth stages with protein solution layers of thickness 0.05 cm we found t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The activity factor (Table 2, ψ) suggests predominant heterogeneous nucleation, which is in good agreement with the expected natural presence of a variety of impurities in solution samples of commercial lysozyme [19]. The walls of the crystallization solution container have a minor contribution to heterogeneous nucleation, even at a high ratio of wall surface to solution volume [25]. The obtained kinetic parameter ( Table 2, A) is similar to that obtained for lysozyme nucleation at relevant crystallization conditions [13].…”
Section: Nucleation Parameterssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The activity factor (Table 2, ψ) suggests predominant heterogeneous nucleation, which is in good agreement with the expected natural presence of a variety of impurities in solution samples of commercial lysozyme [19]. The walls of the crystallization solution container have a minor contribution to heterogeneous nucleation, even at a high ratio of wall surface to solution volume [25]. The obtained kinetic parameter ( Table 2, A) is similar to that obtained for lysozyme nucleation at relevant crystallization conditions [13].…”
Section: Nucleation Parameterssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…[36]: α 0 = 1.35 · 10 −4 K −1 , valid whithin the temperature range: 298 − 323 K. The value obtained for the surface energy: Γ 0 = 5.975gs −2 is compatible with that of the surface tension in a lysozyme solution reported in Ref. [37]: γ ≃ 35gs −2 . For the diffusion coefficient we have obtained D ≃ 1 · 10 −10 µm 2 s −1 .…”
Section: Comparison With Experimentssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Given the operating conditions and as suggested by the experimental results, it is though that both primary heterogeneous nucleation 40 and attrition-induced secondary nucleation 20,41 may have contributed to the nucleation mechanism. Indeed, the rapid increase in turbidity shown in Figure 2 suggests the formation of a large number of crystals in a short time scale, which has been related in previous works 42−45 with the occurrence of secondary nucleation rather than a sudden increase in primary nucleation.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%