2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2020.107311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogenous output regression network for direct face alignment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As training should be performed for each cluster of landmarks, training cost increases. Authors in [61] used both non-linear layers and linear layers for face alignment. The non-linear layers with cosine activations encodes relationships between representations of images and shapes of facial landmarks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As training should be performed for each cluster of landmarks, training cost increases. Authors in [61] used both non-linear layers and linear layers for face alignment. The non-linear layers with cosine activations encodes relationships between representations of images and shapes of facial landmarks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, it decomposes the original multi-target problem into several local sub-tasks, and combines their solutions. Also using deep neural networks, Zhen et al [22] proposed a general model that employs a non-linear layer and a linear low-rank layer to perform direct face alignment via multi-target regression. ERC [23] is an ensemble local approach where multiple regressors are chained in a random order.…”
Section: Multi-target Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many practical applications, such as access control, we may only have very few or even one gallery image of each subject. In this case, it is hard to train or finetune a DNN using gallery images and a pre-trained face classification network is used for robust facial feature 30 5.60% 15.40% 7.52% CFAN 58 5.50% 16.78% 7.69% ESR 31 5.28% 17.00% 7.58% TCDCN 35 4.80% 8.60% 5.54% CFSS 59 4.73% 9.98% 5.76% LBF 56 4.95% 11.98% 6.32% DDFA 60 5.53% 9.56% 6.31% RAR 61 4.12% 8.35% 4.94% TR-DRN 62 4.10% 7.56% 4.99% DSRN 63 4.12% 9.68% 5.21% HORNet 64 4.68% 8.77% 5.68% Our method 3.90% 7.73%…”
Section: Daf Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%