“…The modeled qMab in each case was 46.3, 4.5, and 0.02 pg cell À1 day À1 , respectively. Secondly, as previous reports have highlighted the importance of specific cellular processes as being particularly rate limiting for Mab production, notably disulfide formation in the ER mediated by protein disulfide isomerase (Borth et al, 2005;Davis et al, 2000) and secretory vesicular trafficking (Florin et al, 2009;Peng and Fussenegger, 2009) we used the mathematical model to investigate the increase in qMab arising from a 100% increase in either (i) all folding and assembly reaction rate constants (K HC 2 , K HC 2 LC , K HC 2 LC 2 , and K LC 2 ; Table III) or (ii) all secretory rate constants (i.e., a decrease in t 1=2;ER , t 1=2;LC , t 1=2;LC 2 , and t 1=2;G ; Table III). As shown in Figure 7, increasing the rate constant for Mab assembly had a negligible effect on qMab of almost all cell lines, apart from cell line 164, which exhibits a specific limitation in this Response coefficients were derived from a 0.1% increase in HC/LC transcription rate, HC/LC translation rate, HC 2 LC 2 folding and HC 2 LC 2 secretion rates and from a 0.1% decrease in the rates of both HC/LC mRNA decay (i.e., a 0.1% increase in mRNA stability) and the rate of process.…”