“…Integrating multiple approaches and genetic markers has been acknowledged as most efficient because it provides complementary and more convincing evidence (see e.g., Jakob and Blattner, ; Ma et al., ; Bendiksby et al., ; Krak et al., , ; Mandák et al., ). If tetraploids within Alyssum repens arose by autopolyploidy, we would expect them to cluster with respective diploids in the AFLP analyses, their ITS and DET1 sequences to be placed in a single clade together with those of the parental diploids, and their monoploid genome sizes to be close to those of the parental diploids (see e.g., Brassac et al., ; Rešetnik et al., ; Padilla‐García et al., ). By contrast, if the tetraploids were allopolyploids, we could expect genetic admixture in the AFLP analyses, the presence of divergent DET1 sequences (pointing to homeologous loci) placed in distinct phylogenetic clades together with the respective diploids and additivity of genome size values (e.g., Jakob and Blattner, ; Brassac et al., ; Díaz‐Pérez et al., ; Mandák et al., ; Padilla‐García et al., ).…”