2000
DOI: 10.1080/096031000416433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heteroscedasticity in stock returns data revisited: volume versus GARCH effects

Abstract: The results of Lamoureux and Lastrapes (Journal of Finance, 45, 221-29, 1990) are extended to the UK stock market, and the study examines, in particular, their finding that GARCH modelling captures the serial dependence in volume of trade. Using data on 50 UK companies, we find that although the parameter estimates of the GARCH model become insignificant when volume of trade is used in the conditional variance of returns, the autocorrelations of the squared residuals still exhibit a highly significant GARCH ef… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
40
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, one has to realize that the observation by Lamoureux and Lastrapes (1990) is mainly proof of the fact that trading volume and return volatility are driven by identical factors, leaving the question of the source of the joint process largely unresolved. This GARCH-cum-volume approach has been applied and extended in several studies, such as Lamoureux and Lastrapes (1994), Andersen (1996), Brailsford (1996, and Omran and McKenzie (2000), which occasionally contradict the earlier results by Lamoureux and Lastrapes (1990).…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, one has to realize that the observation by Lamoureux and Lastrapes (1990) is mainly proof of the fact that trading volume and return volatility are driven by identical factors, leaving the question of the source of the joint process largely unresolved. This GARCH-cum-volume approach has been applied and extended in several studies, such as Lamoureux and Lastrapes (1994), Andersen (1996), Brailsford (1996, and Omran and McKenzie (2000), which occasionally contradict the earlier results by Lamoureux and Lastrapes (1990).…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Later, the similar results were obtained in different security markets of different countries or regions. For example, Brailsford (1996), Phylaktis, Kavussanos, and Manalis (1996), Sharma, Mougoue, and Kamath (1996), Omran and Mckednzie (2000), Soo, Lee and Nam (2000), Tarun Chordia and Bhaskaran Swaminathan (2000), Bohl andHenke (2001), Ramaprasad Bhar andShigeyuki Hamori (2004), Ho-Mou Wu and Wen-Chung Guo (2004) and etc. Some researchers further studied positive relationship between return variability and trading volume in terms of financial economy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There is an extensive literature on the relationship between futures trading activities and conditional return volatility (Butterworth, 2000;Omran and Mckenzie, 2000;Fung and Patterson, 2001;Kalotychou and Staikouras, 2006;Hadsell, 2006 and speculative trading activities on futures return or volatility is rarely mentioned in previous studies. Hedge and speculation are the two main techniques for futures trading activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%