2020
DOI: 10.1080/07474938.2020.1735749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heteroscedasticity testing after outlier removal

Abstract: Given the e¤ect that outliers can have on regression and speci…cation testing, a vastly used robusti…cation strategy by practitioners consists in: (i) starting the empirical analysis with an outlier detection procedure to deselect atypical data values; then (ii) continuing the analysis with the selected non-outlying observations. The repercussions of such robustifying procedure on the asymptotic properties of subsequent inferential procedures are, however, underexplored. We study the e¤ects of such a strategy … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Parameters of data that had a normal distribution had a P-Value with an alpha value of more than 0.05 while for data that has an abnormal distribution the alpha value was less than 0.05. The results of the assumption test of the activity variable reaching the button from the use of the RULA analysis method could be seen in Figure 5, which displayed the Summary Report for Button Outreach Activities [10]. The results of the variable assumption test to reach the steering wheel from the use of the RULA analysis method can be seen in Figure 5 Table Summary Report for Steering Outreach Activities.…”
Section: Correlation Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameters of data that had a normal distribution had a P-Value with an alpha value of more than 0.05 while for data that has an abnormal distribution the alpha value was less than 0.05. The results of the assumption test of the activity variable reaching the button from the use of the RULA analysis method could be seen in Figure 5, which displayed the Summary Report for Button Outreach Activities [10]. The results of the variable assumption test to reach the steering wheel from the use of the RULA analysis method can be seen in Figure 5 Table Summary Report for Steering Outreach Activities.…”
Section: Correlation Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, illustration of the problem with detect-and-forget has appeared in some literature. Berenguer-Rico and Wilms (2018) showed how the White test for heteroscedasticity can fail using the detect-andforget approach under asymmetric errors; however, when the errors come from a symmetric distribution, they show how the theory of Berenguer-Rico and Nielsen (2017) can lead to the detect-and-forget approach being valid asymptotically and having good finite-sample performance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%