2010
DOI: 10.1080/00918369.2010.503511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterosexual Men's Anger in Response to Male Homosexuality: Effects of Erotic and Non-Erotic Depictions of Male-Male Intimacy and Sexual Prejudice

Abstract: The present study compared effects of erotic and non-erotic depictions of male-male intimacy on the experience of anger in heterosexual men. Data came from three independent laboratory studies designed to elicit anger in response to erotic or non-erotic depictions of male-male and male-female intimacy. All participants completed a measure of sexual prejudice and anger was assessed before and after viewing the erotic or non-erotic video. Among high-prejudiced men, viewing erotic and non-erotic intimate behavior… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, these effects are only observed when heterosexual men are first exposed to expressions of male-male intimacy (Parrott & Zeichner, 2005), presumably because this situational factor elicits aggression-promoting internal states (Parrott, 2008). Indeed, studies show that sexually prejudiced men who are exposed to male-male, relative to male-female intimacy, experience higher levels of self-reported anger and negative affect (e.g., Bernat et al, 2001; Hudepohl, Parrott, & Zeichner, 2010; Mahaffey, Bryan, & Hutchison, 2005a; 2005b) and hostile cognition (Parrott, Zeichner, & Hoover, 2006). …”
Section: Sexual Prejudice As a Determinant Of Aggression Toward Sexuamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, these effects are only observed when heterosexual men are first exposed to expressions of male-male intimacy (Parrott & Zeichner, 2005), presumably because this situational factor elicits aggression-promoting internal states (Parrott, 2008). Indeed, studies show that sexually prejudiced men who are exposed to male-male, relative to male-female intimacy, experience higher levels of self-reported anger and negative affect (e.g., Bernat et al, 2001; Hudepohl, Parrott, & Zeichner, 2010; Mahaffey, Bryan, & Hutchison, 2005a; 2005b) and hostile cognition (Parrott, Zeichner, & Hoover, 2006). …”
Section: Sexual Prejudice As a Determinant Of Aggression Toward Sexuamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers have found anti-homosexual aversion in some self-identified heterosexual men that may indicate a selfprotective anger often experienced by those who hold hypermasculine ideas and who may (or are anxious they might) experience arousal to same-sex stimuli (Hudepohl, Parrott, & Zeichner, 2010;Zeichner & Reidy, 2009). These negative ideas, anger, and anxiety (i.e., homophobia) may not be the same thing as sexual disgust or aversion.…”
Section: What We Need To Knowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These 'desired' military traits also may be relevant for violent behavior outside the military: masculinity has been identified with sexual violence (Morris 1996); dominance against minority groups (Houdepohl et al 2010); and violent rather than conciliatory responses to interpersonal conflict (Martin et al 2000;Wilkowski et al 2006). (iv) Conversely, military training aims to foster attributes such as maturity, cooperation, and agreeableness, all of which may be negatively related to crime perpetration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%