2020
DOI: 10.17352/ojps.000018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterosis and character association of mid altitude adapted quality protein maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids at Bako, Western Ethiopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
13
7

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
25
13
7
Order By: Relevance
“…It was non-significant for the remaining traits. The result observed in this study is in line with previous reports [36,37,38], (Bitew, 2016) indicating a significant difference among maize genotypes for phenology, yield, yield related, and other agronomic traits. In contrast to the current finding for LFPP, Berhanu [36] reported significant MS.…”
Section: Analysis Of Variancesupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was non-significant for the remaining traits. The result observed in this study is in line with previous reports [36,37,38], (Bitew, 2016) indicating a significant difference among maize genotypes for phenology, yield, yield related, and other agronomic traits. In contrast to the current finding for LFPP, Berhanu [36] reported significant MS.…”
Section: Analysis Of Variancesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Generally, the mean of checks showed higher performance than the mean of crosses (Appendix 1). The overall mean of genotypes in this study was almost similar in magnitude to the overall mean result reported by Berhanu [36] but a little smaller than reported by Demissew [31] and Beyene [38]. The latter two authors reported 347.7 g and 358.7g TSW in a different set of crosses, but while considering among the crosses, the highest TSW was obtained in this study as compared to the report made by Berhanu [36], Demissew [31] and Beyene [38].…”
Section: Mean Comparison In Combined Data Analysissupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Regarding to common leaf rust across locations, crosses as assessed SCA effects, about 22.22% and 11.11% of crosses displayed negative and positive from significant to highly significant SCA effects whereas for husk cover about 41.67% and 27.78% of crosses exhibited negative and positive SCA effect, respectively . Similar results reported by others scholars by different time, place, and designs (Berhanu, 2009;Girma et al, 2015 andBeyene, 2016). GY=grain yield, DA= days to anthesis, DS=days to silking, PH=plant height, EH= ear height, GLS=gray leaf spot, TLB=turcicum leaf blight, CLR=common leaf rusts, NKPR=number of kernels per rows, KRE= number of rows per ear EL=ear length, EPP=ear per plant, ED= ear diameter=thousand kernel weight, SE (LxT) =standard error of specific combining ability of lines by testers, SE (Sji-Skl) =standard error differences of specific combining ability effects of lines by testers.…”
Section: Specific Combining Ability Effect Estimatessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Birhanu [6] evaluated tester crosses of white QPM and CM inbred lines and reported higher grain yield, heterosis overall, mid and better parents, and some of the crosses over the standard checks. Similarly, Beyene [7] reported higher heterosis in diallel crosses evaluated at Bako, Ethiopia. In this study, the aim was to estimate better parent and mid-parent heterosis of the crosses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…According to Miranda [4], heterosis is the genetic expression of the superiority of a hybrid over its parents. Three types of estimation of heterosis are reported in the literature; namely, mid-parent or average heterosis, which is the increased vigor of the F1 over the mean of two parents; and high-parent or better-parent heterosis, which is the increased vigor of F1 over the better-parent [5] and standard heterosis [6][7][8]. Heterosis is usually considered synonymous with hybrid vigor [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%