2017
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.610.339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterosis and Inbreeding Depression for Seed Cotton Yield and Yield Attributing Traits in Intrahirsutum (G. hirsutum L. X G. hirsutum L.) Hybrids of Cotton

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the other traits, there was difference between the means of the F 1 and F 2 generations, which indicates that at least one cross expressed inbreeding depression. These results are in accordance with those obtained by Soomor and Kalhoro (2000), Khan et al (2007;2009), Lukonge et al (2008) and Tigga et al (2017), who reported more pronounced inbreeding depression in agronomic traits of cotton plants.…”
Section: Means Grouping Between Both Generationssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the other traits, there was difference between the means of the F 1 and F 2 generations, which indicates that at least one cross expressed inbreeding depression. These results are in accordance with those obtained by Soomor and Kalhoro (2000), Khan et al (2007;2009), Lukonge et al (2008) and Tigga et al (2017), who reported more pronounced inbreeding depression in agronomic traits of cotton plants.…”
Section: Means Grouping Between Both Generationssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Mean values of the traits percentage of fibers (PF), weight of one boll (P1C) fiber length (UHM), fiber uniformity (UNIF), short fiber index (SFI), fiber strength (STR), and micronaire index (MIC), evaluated in six cotton crosses, in the F 1 and F 2 generation. (2001), Soomor and Kalhoro (2000), Khan et al (2007), Khan et al (2009) and Tigga et al (2017). The hybrids FM 966 × CNPA 7MH and FM 966 × BRS 286 had the lowest estimates of inbreeding depression for most of the traits.…”
Section: Means Grouping Between Both Generationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The estimates of inbreeding depression were significant and positive in all crosses. Similar results were also quoted by Rauf et al (2005) [22] , Panni et al (2012) [16] , Ranganatha et al (2013) [20] , Patel et al (2014) [17] , Sawarkar et al (2015) [23] , Gohil et al (2017) [9] , Isong et al (2017) [11] , Monicashree et al (2017) [15] , Tigga et al (2017) [26] and Rathava et al (2018) [21] . The magnitudes of relative heterosis as well as heterobeltiosis were significant and positive only in cross III for monopodia per plant.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…(2017) [11] , Khan et al (2017) [14] , Monicashree et al (2017) [15] , Tigga et al (2017) [26] , Rathava et al (2018) [21] , Yehia and Hashash (2019) [27] and AL-Hibbiny et al (2020) [4] . In case of days to flowering cross IV depicted significant and positive heterobeltiosis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%