2021
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a7283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterotopia in Individuals with 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MR imaging studies and neuropathologic findings in individuals with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome show anomalous early brain development. We aimed to retrospectively evaluate cerebral abnormalities, focusing on gray matter heterotopia, and to correlate these with subjects' neuropsychiatric impairments.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three raters assessed gray matter heterotopia and other morphologic brain abnormalities on 3D T1WI and T2*WI in 75 individuals with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (27 females… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The etiology of PH is not known. Several studies have shown that PH is associated with genetic abnormalities, including FLNA mutation, 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, and fragile X syndrome (3,(10)(11)(12), epilepsy, systemic malformation, and developmental delays, such as intelligence and dyslexia were also easily found in previous reports (3-5, 13, 14). However, neuropsychiatric disorders, particularly in pediatric patients, are underrecognized in PH (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The etiology of PH is not known. Several studies have shown that PH is associated with genetic abnormalities, including FLNA mutation, 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, and fragile X syndrome (3,(10)(11)(12), epilepsy, systemic malformation, and developmental delays, such as intelligence and dyslexia were also easily found in previous reports (3-5, 13, 14). However, neuropsychiatric disorders, particularly in pediatric patients, are underrecognized in PH (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%