2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2014.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterotopic ossification after hemiarthroplasty of the hip – A comparison of three common approaches

Abstract: Our data is the first to evaluate surgical approach and HO in patients with hemiarthroplasty. Patients have a significant risk of developing higher grade HO based on surgical approach (A or AL). Orthopedists should be mindful of these risks when considering A or AL approaches.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several factors involved in HO, including hypertrophic osteoarthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and male gender 63 64) . Among them, surgical approach is one of the important factors that cause HO 63) . Compared to anterior or anterolateral approaches, the posterior approach to the hip joint involves less abductor manipulation, which may influence the occurrence of HO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several factors involved in HO, including hypertrophic osteoarthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and male gender 63 64) . Among them, surgical approach is one of the important factors that cause HO 63) . Compared to anterior or anterolateral approaches, the posterior approach to the hip joint involves less abductor manipulation, which may influence the occurrence of HO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have reported dislocation rates as high as 9%-13% with the posterior approach, although a recent meta-analysis of 13,000 patients found this rate to be closer to 3.20% [10] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] , [16] . The anterolateral and direct anterior approaches have been used in order to minimize dislocation, but the anterolateral approach has been associated with abductor tendon injury and heterotopic ossification and the direct anterior approach has been associated with periprosthetic femur fracture, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury, wound complications, and a steep learning curve for the surgeon [17] , [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] , [22] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main reasons could be the posterolateral surgical approach. 24) In addition, according to the literature, thromboprophylaxis with LMWH 4,000 IU per day was continued for 35-40 days and patients managed it autonomously without any bleeding complications. 25) In the literature, there is a wide debate concerning the prevention of a secondary fracture after a fragility fracture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%