2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92174-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterotrophic euglenid Rhabdomonas costata resembles its phototrophic relatives in many aspects of molecular and cell biology

Abstract: Euglenids represent a group of protists with diverse modes of feeding. To date, only a partial genomic sequence of Euglena gracilis and transcriptomes of several phototrophic and secondarily osmotrophic species are available, while primarily heterotrophic euglenids are seriously undersampled. In this work, we begin to fill this gap by presenting genomic and transcriptomic drafts of a primary osmotroph, Rhabdomonas costata. The current genomic assembly length of 100 Mbp is 14× smaller than that of E. gracilis. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(90 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(LFNC01000001.1) and Phytomonas serpens (AIHY00000000.1) were accessed from GenBank [ 56 , 57 ]. Raw reads were accessed (last time on 05/05/21) for Euglena viridis (SRR14099996) [ 58 ], Rhabdomonas costata [ 59 ], B. saltans (ERR036178) [ 60 ], Papus ankaliazontas (SRR13394431), Ankaliazontas spiralis and Procryptobia sorokini (cocultured, SRR13394430) [ 61 ]. These were processed in the same way as diplonemid assemblies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(LFNC01000001.1) and Phytomonas serpens (AIHY00000000.1) were accessed from GenBank [ 56 , 57 ]. Raw reads were accessed (last time on 05/05/21) for Euglena viridis (SRR14099996) [ 58 ], Rhabdomonas costata [ 59 ], B. saltans (ERR036178) [ 60 ], Papus ankaliazontas (SRR13394431), Ankaliazontas spiralis and Procryptobia sorokini (cocultured, SRR13394430) [ 61 ]. These were processed in the same way as diplonemid assemblies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We classified 166 of these as class I proteins with bipartite signal sequences and 73 as class II proteins with only a signal peptide ( Dataset S1 and SI Appendix , section 1.5 ); we also annotated 35 proteins as transporters, constituting integral membrane proteins of the chloroplast envelope ( Dataset S1 ). To validate the specificity of our approach on a negative control, we performed the same analysis on the predicted proteome of heterotrophic euglenid, Rhabdomonas costata, previously suggested to ancestrally lack chloroplasts ( 23 ). Here we predicted 2,082 candidates with putative bipartite signals, which we then checked for contaminations, transmembrane domains and annotated their functions yielding 63 proteins ( Dataset S2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We classified 166 of these as class I proteins with bipartite signal sequences and 73 as class II proteins with only a signal peptide (Table S2; SI Text , Section 1.5); we also annotated 35 proteins as transporters, constituting integral membrane proteins of the chloroplast envelope (Table S2). To validate the specificity of our approach on a negative control, we performed the same analysis on the predicted proteome of heterotrophic euglenid, Rhabdomonas costata , previously suggested to ancestrally lack chloroplasts (23). Here we predicted 2082 candidates with putative bipartite signals, which we then checked for contaminations, transmembrane domains and annotated their functions yielding 63 proteins (Table S3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%