2015
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-16-s7-s5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterozygous genome assembly via binary classification of homologous sequence

Abstract: BackgroundGenome assemblers to date have predominantly targeted haploid reference reconstruction from homozygous data. When applied to diploid genome assembly, these assemblers perform poorly, owing to the violation of assumptions during both the contigging and scaffolding phases. Effective tools to overcome these problems are in growing demand. Increasing parameter stringency during contigging is an effective solution to obtaining haplotype-specific contigs; however, effective algorithms for scaffolding such … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This shortcoming of the most common assemblers (e.g. ABYSS, Trinity and Velvet) is due to the fact that they were designed to assemble sequences of haploid genomes and they are not optimized for heterozygous sequences or genomes (Bodily et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This shortcoming of the most common assemblers (e.g. ABYSS, Trinity and Velvet) is due to the fact that they were designed to assemble sequences of haploid genomes and they are not optimized for heterozygous sequences or genomes (Bodily et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This shortcoming of the most common assemblers (e.g. ABYSS, Trinity and Velvet) is due to the fact that they were designed to assemble haploid sequences and are not optimized for heterozygous sequences or genomes (Bodily et al 2015). Second, not only are allele sequences the more appropriate data type, but phasing sequence capture data also leads to a doubling of the effective sample size, since two sequences are compiled for a diploid individual, in contrast to the single sequence per individual that is recovered when taking the contig approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of duplicated genes and polyploidy split the assembly, thus leading to shorter scaffolds and contigs. 18 , 19 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, assembling a highly heterozygous genotype, accurate phasing, and aligning of Vitis haplotypes is still challenging. With regard to the data on hand and the complexity of this assembly, the application of dedicated scaffolding tools like scaffoldScaffolder (Bodily et al, 2015) or SSPACE (Boetzer et al, 2011) comes at a high risk of generating erroneous connections between contigs. Therefore, we calculated the BoeWGS1.0 assembly with very stringent parameters using the CLC Genomics Workbench toolkit, which contains an implementation of a de Bruijn Graph assembler, and refrained from scaffolding.…”
Section: Genome Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%