2017
DOI: 10.1299/jamdsm.2017jamdsm0003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heuristic algorithms with rounded weights for a combinatorial food packing problem

Abstract: In this paper, a lexicographic bi-criteria food packing problem arising in actual packaging equipments is considered. Given a set I = {i | i = 1, 2, . . . , n} of current n items (for example, n green peppers) with their weights w i and priorities p i , the problem asks to find a subset I ′ (⊆ I) so that the total weight ∑ i∈I ′ w i is no less than a given positive t which denotes a target weight for each package, and it is minimized as the primary objective, and further the total priority ∑ i∈I ′ p i is maxim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we are treating the problem with m = 2. Karuno and Saito (2017) have considered the problem with m = 1, and showed that a greedy heuristic solution with the total weight at most twice the minimum attains the total priority at least the conditionally maximum. As mentioned in the previous section, Karuno and Nakahama (2017) have started the performance guarantee analysis of greedy heuristic solutions for the problem with m = 2, but they have only illustrated an instance-dependent ratio of the greedy heuristic total priority to the conditionally maximum, which is unfortunately less than one.…”
Section: Heuristic Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we are treating the problem with m = 2. Karuno and Saito (2017) have considered the problem with m = 1, and showed that a greedy heuristic solution with the total weight at most twice the minimum attains the total priority at least the conditionally maximum. As mentioned in the previous section, Karuno and Nakahama (2017) have started the performance guarantee analysis of greedy heuristic solutions for the problem with m = 2, but they have only illustrated an instance-dependent ratio of the greedy heuristic total priority to the conditionally maximum, which is unfortunately less than one.…”
Section: Heuristic Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This algorithm aimed to minimise the maximum time items spent in the system heuristically, while also keeping the total weight of each package as close to the target weight as possible. Some authors (Imahori et al, 2011(Imahori et al, , 2012Karuno et al, 2013;Karuno and Tateishi, 2014;Karuno and Saito, 2017) have studied the possibility of improving this bi-objective optimisation model. Other authors, such as Imahori et al (2012) and Karuno et al (2010), have investigated different types of packaging operations, developing several algorithms for double-layered and duplex packaging systems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problem R-i is the minimum knapsack problem and also for the problem, there is a pseudo-polynomial time dynamic programming procedure (8,10,11) . By using the dynamic programming procedure with a small modification, as Lemma 1, we also have the following lemma : Lemma 2.…”
Section: Rounding Weights Of Itemsmentioning
confidence: 99%