2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.comcom.2006.08.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heuristic and optimal techniques for light-trail assignment in optical ring WDM networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This aspect requires a unique node design for light-trail technology. In the work done so far on light-trails [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] to the best of our knowledge the node design has not been considered in detail. We, in this paper delve upon this aspect of light-trail technology.…”
Section: Light-trail Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This aspect requires a unique node design for light-trail technology. In the work done so far on light-trails [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] to the best of our knowledge the node design has not been considered in detail. We, in this paper delve upon this aspect of light-trail technology.…”
Section: Light-trail Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a topology of light-trails over a network exemplifies a virtual embedded topology. Optimal light-trail topology design is an important issue under investigation [11][12][13]. Further, dynamic schemes for light-trail design lead to a selfoptimizing virtual topology [2].…”
Section: Light-trail Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that while in light-trails the optimization is considered over the entire bus (i.e. the capacity constraints take the entire bus bandwidth into consideration) [7], in LiTPiCs the optimization takes a per-span value into consideration. This deviation is necessary to take into consideration the formation of PIC-Trails, as PIC-Trails can divide a LiTPiC into several buses.…”
Section: Per-span Capacity Constraintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, a node i part of LiTPiC k continues to monitor the bidding process in LiTPiC k', if k' is of interest to node i. LiTPiC k' is of interest to node i if (a) k' contains all destination nodes that node i is interested in transmitting data to, and (b) the total value of traffic in k' can accommodate additional traffic from i, if node i so chooses to become a member of k'. The deciding point that determines when node i should leave LiTPiC k for k' (though it still continues to be a passive [7] member of k -without transmitting or bidding for bandwidth in k) is:…”
Section: Litpic Control Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%