2018
DOI: 10.1108/lht-07-2017-0144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heuristic evaluation of e-dictionaries

Abstract: Purpose-The purpose of this paper is to discuss the heuristic evaluations of five edictionaries according to the criteria developed by Ball and Bothma (2018). E-dictionaries are increasingly making use of modern information technology to create advanced information tools. It is necessary to ensure that these new products are still usable. Heuristic evaluation is a usability evaluation method used to evaluate the usability of a product. Design/methodology/approach-Five e-dictionaries were evaluated through heur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting to point out that the productions that work with usability are, in their majority, practical/applied studies (15 productions). Such as the productions by Ball and Bothma (2018) that presents the heuristic evaluation of e-dictionaries; and by Rogers and Preston (2009) that analyzes the usability for IA redesign of a library website. It is noticed in the SCOPUS productions a smaller exploration, compared to the Brazilian context, of the relationship of IA with Information Findability, since only 3 productions discuss Findability and associate it with IA and none of them deepens the discussion, thus there is no production in SCOPUS that fits in the category "Information Architecture and Findability".…”
Section: Chartmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting to point out that the productions that work with usability are, in their majority, practical/applied studies (15 productions). Such as the productions by Ball and Bothma (2018) that presents the heuristic evaluation of e-dictionaries; and by Rogers and Preston (2009) that analyzes the usability for IA redesign of a library website. It is noticed in the SCOPUS productions a smaller exploration, compared to the Brazilian context, of the relationship of IA with Information Findability, since only 3 productions discuss Findability and associate it with IA and none of them deepens the discussion, thus there is no production in SCOPUS that fits in the category "Information Architecture and Findability".…”
Section: Chartmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pada tahap ini peneliti tidak membuat instumen dari awal melainkan menggunakan instrumen dari penelitian terdahulu yaitu yang dibuat oleh Hale H. Turhangil Erenler dengan judul "Heuristic Evaluation of E-Learning" [17]. Hasil dari penelitian tersebut adalah tersaringnya 8 prinsip dari 10 prinsip yang memiliki reliabilitas diatas ratarata.…”
Section: B Penyusunan Instrumenunclassified
“…It can be carried out at any software development stage upon identifying the problem and usually presents the best practical results (Kumar et al, 2020). The expert goes through the system once to get familiar with it during the heuristic evaluation and then thoroughly assesses the specific heuristics (Ball and Bothma, 2018). A maximum of five experts can identify usability problems (J.…”
Section: Heurestic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%