Heuristic Optimization Methods for Dynamic Panel Data Model Selection: Application on the Russian Innovative Performance

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Innovations, be they radical new products or technology improvements are widely recognized as a key factor of economic growth. To identify the factors triggering innovative activities is a main concern for economic theory and empirical analysis. As the number of hypotheses is large, the process of model selection becomes a crucial part of the empirical implementation. The problem is complicated by the fact that unobserved heterogeneity and possible endogeneity of regressors have to be taken into account. A new efficient solution to this problem is suggested, applying optimization heuristics, which exploits the inherent discrete nature of the problem. The model selection is based on information criteria and the Sargan test of overidentifying restrictions. The method is applied to Russian regional data within the framework of a log-linear dynamic panel data model. To illustrate the performance of the method, we also report the results of Monte-Carlo simulations. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may

Estimating the role of labor resources reallocation between sectors on the growth of aggregate labor productivity in the Russian economy

“…Thus, we found that the role of competitive market selection for labor productivity growth has increased somewhat in Russia in recent years, but predominantly this reallocation occurs not in (but rather from) manufacturing but in construction, transport, and trade. This suggests that we should consider how to stop the outflow of labor from manufacturing by creating innovative directions in production and encouraging domestic enterprises to expand their market share both in the domestic market and by exporting their goods abroad (Savin and Winker, 2009;Savin and Winker, 2012).…”

The Effects of Neoliberalism and Trade Liberalization on China’s Environment Over Time

“…Since the explanatory factors in the model might have a lagged effect on the outcome variables, and since a static model would not adequately capture such effects, a re-specified model with a set of lagged independent variables was tested (Sachs and Schleer 2013). Within this vein, the model was estimated by adjusting the lag length from 0 to four years, using the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and heuristic judgment, which has been shown to provide reliable parameter estimates (Kapetanios 2007;Savin and Winker 2012). Overall, the results from the BIC test indicate that changing the lag length from two to three years does not substantially alter the findings.…”

Untitled

“…Некоторые исследователи при анализе инноваций применяют методы сокращения числа факторов: многомерный статистический анализ, сжимающий пространство данных [15], или нейросетевые алгоритмы, отбирающие наилучший набор факторов [16]. Но, как нам кажется, экономическая интерпретация результатов важнее продвинутости инструментария, который иногда может давать странные результаты в условиях неболь- Фиксированные эффекты допускают уникальные ненаблюдаемые ошибки для каждого региона.…”