2014
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hexagonal undersampling for faster MRI near metallic implants

Abstract: Purpose Slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC) acquires a 3D image of each excited slice with view-angle tilting to reduce slice and readout direction artifacts respectively, but requires additional imaging time. The purpose of this study is to provide a technique for faster imaging around metallic implants by undersampling k-space. Methods Assuming that areas of slice distortion are localized, hexagonal sampling can reduce imaging time by 50% compared with conventional scans. This work demonst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Field‐of‐view reduction strategies near metal that were not implemented in the present study may prove helpful, such as adaptive phase encoding , slab selection , and/or changing slab selection gradients between excitation and refocusing . Recently proposed reconstruction and sampling strategies tailored for 3D‐MSI acquisitions may allow higher acceleration factors: hexagonal undersampling of the ACR combined with a masking operation to eliminate the aliased signal , exploiting the unique spatial distribution of signal encoded for each RF offset in a manner analogous to parallel imaging , and an ultrawide excitation bandwidth calibration scan that allows externally calibrated parallel imaging, eliminating the need for self‐calibration (and therefore a fully sampled k ‐space region) at each RF offset .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field‐of‐view reduction strategies near metal that were not implemented in the present study may prove helpful, such as adaptive phase encoding , slab selection , and/or changing slab selection gradients between excitation and refocusing . Recently proposed reconstruction and sampling strategies tailored for 3D‐MSI acquisitions may allow higher acceleration factors: hexagonal undersampling of the ACR combined with a masking operation to eliminate the aliased signal , exploiting the unique spatial distribution of signal encoded for each RF offset in a manner analogous to parallel imaging , and an ultrawide excitation bandwidth calibration scan that allows externally calibrated parallel imaging, eliminating the need for self‐calibration (and therefore a fully sampled k ‐space region) at each RF offset .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimization of pulse‐sequence design, such as strategies to reduce the FOV and optimization of multiband excitations , are complementary methods that could be used to further accelerate acquisitions. Furthermore, improvements in reconstruction techniques through the use of compressed sensing , hexagonal undersampling , and/or off‐resonance encoding could also accelerate acquisitions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimization of pulse-sequence design, such as strategies to reduce the FOV (8,23) and optimization of multiband excitations (16), are complementary methods that could be used to further accelerate acquisitions. Furthermore, improvements in reconstruction techniques through the use of compressed sensing (12,24), hexagonal undersampling (21), and/or off-resonance encoding (14) could also accelerate acquisitions. Acquisition of a single high-resolution fully phaseencoded UTE acquisition rather than a low-resolution calibration and a 3D-MSI acquisition may also be a viable option for in vivo imaging near metal (25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analogous to the original CLEAR method, Equation [9] is shown to be the product of a full-rank matrix and a low-rank matrix R b diagðcos ð/X 0 ÞÞS diagðsin ð/X 0 ÞÞS ½ , which can be viewed as 2N C real-valued channel sensitivities. A modifed regularizer is…”
Section: Fig 2 Rate-distortion Curves Showing Rmse Versus Compressionmentioning
confidence: 99%