2016
DOI: 10.2217/fon-2015-0021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hexaminolevulinate Hydrochloride Blue-Light Flexible Cystoscopy in the Detection and Follow-Up of Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Cost Consequences During Outpatient Surveillance in Sweden

Abstract: HAL BLFC allowed more outpatient treatment with improved recurrence detection and reduced transurethral resection of the bladder tumors, cystectomies, bed days and operating room time, with minimal cost impact across all risk groups, demonstrating the economic benefits of introducing HAL.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model, based on the Swedish health care system, indicates that BLFC would allow more outpatient treatment with improved detection of recurrent tumors, resulting in reduced need for TURB, cystectomies, bed days, and operating room time. 20 BLFC use across all risk groups would have minimal budget impact (+1.6% total cost) over 5 years and would achieve cost savings in intermediate- and high-risk groups from year 2. 20 The actual cost benefit of BLFC in different health care settings needs to be confirmed in real-world studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model, based on the Swedish health care system, indicates that BLFC would allow more outpatient treatment with improved detection of recurrent tumors, resulting in reduced need for TURB, cystectomies, bed days, and operating room time. 20 BLFC use across all risk groups would have minimal budget impact (+1.6% total cost) over 5 years and would achieve cost savings in intermediate- and high-risk groups from year 2. 20 The actual cost benefit of BLFC in different health care settings needs to be confirmed in real-world studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 20 BLFC use across all risk groups would have minimal budget impact (+1.6% total cost) over 5 years and would achieve cost savings in intermediate- and high-risk groups from year 2. 20 The actual cost benefit of BLFC in different health care settings needs to be confirmed in real-world studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially targeting HALC to high-risk patients seems an appropriate means of introducing the use of this technique within a treatment centre. Thus, while HALC may lead to long-term benefits across all risk groups compared with WLC, high-risk patients seem to benefit most [16]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study from Sweden modelling the cost consequences of HALC found that the technique had a minimal cost impact if introduced across all risk groups, and reduced TURBs, cystectomies, bed days, and operating room time. Notably, the use of HALC translated into cost savings from year 2–5 in this model [16]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies reported on a range of different findings. Of the 37 studies identified from SLR searches, fifteen were cost studies, of which one evaluated total healthcare costs of bladder cancer in the US; 75 one was a US Markov model of healthcare costs by disease risk; 76 four were US database studies evaluating varying provider-level treatment intensity among Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years; 12,13,77,78 three assessed diagnosis and monitoring costs; [79][80][81] three assessed different imaging technologies; [82][83][84] and two evaluated intravesical chemotherapy post-TURBT. 85,86 In addition, three budget impact models (BIMs) and eighteen CEAs were identified from SLR searches, of which twelve evaluated TURBT, mainly comparing diagnostic imaging during the procedure as well as comparing TURBT to other procedures or procedure setting.…”
Section: Economic Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%