Proliferation of social media has increased the amount of personal information available about users online, and this information is increasingly available to anyone including advertisers and other (unknown) users. Having knowledge about others creates information asymmetries that can be used strategically in compliance gaining scenarios. In an online text-based interaction, 66 (31 male and 35 female) same-sex dyads engaged in conversation with one partner tasked in gaining his partner's compliance. When the persuading partner benefited from information asymmetry, he was more successful at getting his conversation partner to comply with requests (42% success rate vs. 9% in the control condition). Text analysis using Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count indicates that while asymmetry affected conversational topics, compliance was linked to linguistic style -not content -as well as individual differences such as sex and behavioral sensitivity. This study demonstrates how individuals might utilize publicly available information about others in conversation to achieve self-serving goals. Implications for information sharing online are discussed.Traditional mass media -like television and radio -connect individuals globally through information sharing about news and events. Technological innovation in the form of new and social media platforms has shifted the direction of information flow such that our roles have shifted from content consumers to producers. Web blogs and social network sites (SNSs) are prime examples of platforms that enable users to self-disclose high levels of personal information and push this content to large and often anonymous audiences (Stefanone, Lackaff, & Rosen, 2010), which raises questions about possible information asymmetric situations.Facebook strategically leverages a host of information about users, as its business model allows advertisers pay premiums for the ability to direct targeted ads to Facebook (2013) users based on data gathered from their profiles and from patterns of information found on those users' 'friends' profiles. Users accept the terms of this relationship because it is perceived as an equal exchange as users are allowed free access to the social media platform. In reality, sites like Facebook are providing standardized and publicly accessible databases of user preferences and behavior -including where they live, favorite hobbies, relationship status, etc. -that