2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b03169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HFRR and SL-BOCLE Lubricity of Paraffinic Diesel Fuels Considering Different Origins and Final Formulations with Biodiesels and Additives

Abstract: The lubricant characteristics of different paraffinic diesel fuel formulations, including biodiesel and lubricity improvers, were tested and compared with the characteristics of conventional middle distillates. The procedures to evaluate the ability to avoid seizure were the high-frequency reciprocating rig (HFRR) and scuffing load ball on cylinder essay (SL-BOCLE) test. The paraffinic fuels selected for this work were as follows: gas to liquid from gas reforming, coal to liquid from coal gasification, and two… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To prevent possible problems and secure a sufficient lubricity level, suppliers of fuel injection systems postulated applying an extra lubricity evaluation test and incorporating it into the paraffinic diesel fuel specification. They suggested the SLBOCLE test with a minimum limit of 3500 g. However, the carried out studies [68][69][70] involving the application of both HFRR and SLBOCLE techniques demonstrated that the HFRR test is sufficient to control paraffinic fuels lubricity and it is not necessary to use SLBOCLE as an additional test. The eventual application of the SLBOCLE technique would require a substantial improvement in its repeatability and reproducibility.…”
Section: Fuel Lubricity Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prevent possible problems and secure a sufficient lubricity level, suppliers of fuel injection systems postulated applying an extra lubricity evaluation test and incorporating it into the paraffinic diesel fuel specification. They suggested the SLBOCLE test with a minimum limit of 3500 g. However, the carried out studies [68][69][70] involving the application of both HFRR and SLBOCLE techniques demonstrated that the HFRR test is sufficient to control paraffinic fuels lubricity and it is not necessary to use SLBOCLE as an additional test. The eventual application of the SLBOCLE technique would require a substantial improvement in its repeatability and reproducibility.…”
Section: Fuel Lubricity Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the many different methods of evaluating lubricity, three have basically found wide industrial use [30]: the high-frequency reciprocating rig (HFFR) [31], the ball-oncylinder lubricity evaluator (BOCLE) [32], and the scuffing load ball-on-cylinder lubricity evaluator (SLBOCLE) [33]. The HFFR method is utilized in this experiment because many fuel quality standards specify lubricity determined by the HFFR method, which has several advantages over other lubricity determination methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Engine parts require fuel lubrication to reduce mating part friction. A fuel is deemed dry if it does not contain enough lubricant materials to lubricate parts such as cylinder liners, the fuel delivery and injection system, and so forth [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%