2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2014.06.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hg oxidation reaction mechanism on Fe2O3 with H2S: Comparison between theory and experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In curve C, three obvious endothermic peaks at 430°C, 470°C and 560°C can be observed, which show that at least three new substances generated at 230°C. It fits well with the results of our TPD tests [16].…”
Section: Qualitative Determination Of the Contrastive Samples By Tg/dscsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In curve C, three obvious endothermic peaks at 430°C, 470°C and 560°C can be observed, which show that at least three new substances generated at 230°C. It fits well with the results of our TPD tests [16].…”
Section: Qualitative Determination Of the Contrastive Samples By Tg/dscsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Recently, our computational work also demonstrated the reaction mechanism of elemental mercury adsorption on Fe 2 O 3 in the presence of H 2 S, which drawn a conclusion that Eley-Rideal mechanism with H 2 S pre-adsorption is the most probable [12]. Simultaneously, we have verified it by a series of experiments and affirmed that either Fe 2 O 3 or H 2 S is indispensable for the elemental mercury removal [16]. Nevertheless, the effect of reaction temperature on removing mercury is still unknown.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…It can be seen from the figure that the original Fe 2 O 3 loses the mercury removal ability after 20 min, while the mercury removal performance of H 2 S-modified Fe 2 O 3 adsorbents is significantly improved with the increase of vulcanization temperature. Xue et al demonstrated that Hg 0 prefers to bind with the Fe atom on both α-Fe 2 O 3 and γ-Fe 2 O 3 surface in the way of physisorption. Galbreath et al indicated that α-Fe 2 O 3 fails to change the form of mercury and γ-Fe 2 O 3 could facilitate the oxidation of mercury.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, Fe 2 O 3 , as a commonly used desulfurization adsorbent, has been well studied in mercury removal under reductive atmosphere, showing excellent mercury removal performance. Some studies have suggested that H 2 S can boost the mercury removal ability of iron oxide, but the mercury removal ability of Fe 2 O 3 itself is weak relying on physical adsorption. , Tao et al investigated Hg 0 adsorption mechanism on the α-Fe 2 O 3 surface with H 2 S using density functional theory calculations and demonstrated that the Eley–Rideal mechanism is the most suitable reaction process. Liu et al investigated the role of H 2 S on the simultaneous reaction of Hg 0 + H 2 S + Fe 2 O 3 from an experimental perspective and deduced the foundational mercury adsorptive products through the element valence changes before and after the reaction but failed to give the specific reaction process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a series of adsorption experiments has been carried out to verify the mechanism. 133 H 2 S and Fe 2 O 3 are both indispensable factors for the high removal efficiency of Hg 0 , and Fe 2 O 3 behaves much more actively in Hg 0 adsorption under the influence of H 2 S. Hg adsorption experiments on H 2 S pre-adsorbed a-Fe 2 O 3 shows that H 2 S can be adsorbed on the surface of Fe 2 O 3 , and the adsorbed H 2 S plays a dominant role in subsequent Hg 0 removal, which is in good agreement with the results of theoretical calculations.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%