Publication information Journal of Sound and Vibration, 332 (13): 3201-3217Publisher Elsevier Item record/more information http://hdl.handle.net/10197/6212
Publisher's statementThis is the author's version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Sound and Vibration. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Sound and Vibration (VOL 332, ISSUE 13, (2013) that did not appear in the healthy structure is present in the response of the damaged structure. This paper elucidates from first principles how the acceleration response can be assumed to consist of 'static' and 'dynamic' components, and where the beam has experienced a localised loss in stiffness, an additional 'damage' component. The combination of these components establishes how the damage singularity will appear in the total response.For a given damage severity, the amplitude of the 'damage' component will depend on how close the damage location is to the sensor, and its frequency content will increase with higher velocities of the moving force. The latter has implications for damage detection because if the frequency content of the 'damage' component includes bridge and/or vehicle frequencies, it becomes more difficult to identify damage. The paper illustrates how a thorough understanding of the relationship between the 'static' and 'damage' components contributes *Manuscript Click here to download Manuscript: Manuscript RevC.doc Click here to view linked References 2 to establish if damage has occurred and to provide an estimation of its location and severity.The findings are corroborated using accelerations from a planar finite element simulation model where the effects of force velocity and bridge span are examined.