2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2019.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hidden emissions of forest transitions: a socio-ecological reading of forest change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, agricultural intensification and specialization enabled C sequestration in the course of the forest transition, but was only possible by mechanization, inputs of mineral fertilizers, long‐distance trade of animal feed, and increasing livestock density, which in turn generated significant amounts of greenhouse gas emissions. Balancing the climate‐change mitigation effects of forest transitions against their “hidden emissions” (Gingrich et al, ) emphasizes the need to further integrate land‐use modeling tools, such as the CRAFT model, in order to better quantify and allocate the C budgets related to long‐term land‐use change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, agricultural intensification and specialization enabled C sequestration in the course of the forest transition, but was only possible by mechanization, inputs of mineral fertilizers, long‐distance trade of animal feed, and increasing livestock density, which in turn generated significant amounts of greenhouse gas emissions. Balancing the climate‐change mitigation effects of forest transitions against their “hidden emissions” (Gingrich et al, ) emphasizes the need to further integrate land‐use modeling tools, such as the CRAFT model, in order to better quantify and allocate the C budgets related to long‐term land‐use change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the expansion of forest area was made possible by agricultural intensification, notably the development of fodder crops and abandonment of extensive grazing and other marginal land uses (Erb et al, 2008;Gingrich et al, 2019;Mather & Needle, 1998), and through the development of international agricultural trade promoted by the free trade agreements under Napoléon III (Duby & Walon, 1993). However, new regulations and rules governing the access and use of forests also impacted forest change, as did a more acute perception of forest degradation and the threat that it represents for the French economy (Mather et al, 1999) 1900 1900-1910 1910-1920 1920-1930 1930-1940 1940-1950 1950-1960 1960-1970 1970-1980 1980-1990 1990-2000 2000-2010 MtonC Biomass density Species composition Area Biomass C stocks (Le Noë, Billen, Esculier, & Garnier, 2018;Le Noë, Billen, Mary, et al, 2019).…”
Section: Drivers Of Forest Expansionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By contrast, full territorial/production-based GHG accounts also need to quantify emissions from land-use and land-cover changes (LULUCF) as well as highly uncertain and strongly context-dependent emissions such as those of CH 4 and N 2 O. Comprehensive assessments of GHG emissions over many decades (in particular with relation to the LULUCF component for long-term changes in carbon stocks in soils and above-ground biomass) are only recently becoming available and will add important new aspects to the decoupling issue (Gingrich et al 2019). The literature analyzing GHG-GDP impact decoupling is therefore quite driven by the improvement in data availability over time.…”
Section: Research On Emissions Decouplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that the data we are sharing with the scientific community offers new possibilities for studying the impact of historical socio-economic processes on the current functioning of regions or ecosystems. Recently, the importance of historical processes in solving future challenges has been noticed by scholars (Gingrich et al, 2019), and we believe our dataset may be useful and contribute to similar research in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%