This essay considers how appeals for the abolition of structures of unfreedom, situations of violence and harm, and enduring practices of neglect and dehumanisation are generated through acts of unruly migration. It does so on the basis of a close engagement with a counter-archive of migratory testimonies that was produced during 2015 and 2016 with people who had migrated -or were planning to migrate -across the Mediterranean to Europe. Drawing inspiration from Ruth Wilson Gilmore's conceptualisation of 'organised abandonment', the essay suggests that key dimensions of an abolitionist politics are evident in refusals of the racialised, gendered and classed dynamics of militarism and colonialism that are integral to the border complex. In so doing, it also reflects on alternatives -transformative imaginaries and forms of organising that emerge through what are interpreted as abolitionist acts of migration. 'Everybody is free.' (Nigerian woman, Rome) 'Let us live in security.' (Cameroonian woman, Rome) 'Consider us as humans.' (Ethiopian man, Malta)Freedom, security, respect: these are just a few of the demands advanced by people migrating across the Mediterranean in precarious conditions during 2015 and 2016. In this essay, I argue that, although these statements stand as appeals to equal treatment, they can also be interpreted as appeals for the abolition of structures of unfreedom, situations of violence and harm, and enduring practices of neglect and dehumanisation. Indeed, by reading further into these demands, I suggest that a range of abolitionist alternatives emerge that refuse the power and violence of racialised, gendered and classed bordering practices. These alternatives beckon a world where it is no longer the case that "White people normally go to Nigeria" while Nigerians face barriers in return (Nigerian woman, Rome);[1] a world where people are no longer denied the right to migrate while "security issues are not solved" in the regions from which they flee (Cameroonian woman, Rome); and a world where the contributions that people migrating can make "not only to the economy but also in policy-making" are no longer ignored (Ethiopian man, Malta).My aim in this essay is to further reflect on some of the ways in which unruly acts of migration can be interpreted as a refusal of the concrete manifestations of violence and harm that are embedded within racialised, gendered and classed bordering practices. I use the term 'unruly' in broad terms here, to refer to migrations that in various ways challenge or exceed the attempts of states to govern migration (Tazzioli 2019). Rather than confining my focus to state power in a narrow sense, I draw from Ruth Wilson Gilmore's suggestion that the prison industrial complex involves "all sorts of people and places that are tied in, or want to be tied in, to that complex" (2012, 3f.). A similar argument can be made about the 'border industrial complex ', which Todd Miller (2021) examines in the US context to highlight how territorial borders function as sites of borde...